Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;12(8):e028116. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028116

Table 2.

Unadjusted Comparison of Arterial Hemodynamics Between Preeclampsia and Controls

Variable Preeclampsia (n=40) mean±SD Controls (n=40) mean±SD P value
Aortic stiffness
cfPWV, m/s 6.3±1.0 5.7±0.7 0.001*
e‐aPWV (m/s) – median (IQR) 6.4 (5.9–7.0) 5.9 (5.6–6.1) <0.0001
EVA, n (%) 14 (45%) 3 (18%) 0.049
Pulsatile arterial load
Zc, dyne × s × m−5 186.0±53.8 175.0±4.3.5 0.320*
Pf, mm Hg 39±11 37±9 0.323*
PAC (10−6 cm4/dyne) – median (IQR) 8.9 (6.9–10.4) 10.0 (8.7–12.0) 0.032
TAC, mL/mm Hg 1.5±0.5 1.7±0.4 0.049*
Central blood pressure
Central SBP, mm Hg 110 (97–122) 94 (90–100) <0.0001
Central DBP, mm Hg 62 (58–72) 54 (52–60) <0.0001
Central PP, mm Hg 46±14 39±8 0.010*
Steady arterial load
SVR, dyne×s×cm−5 1881.0 (1639.0–2133.0) 1571.5 (1397.5–1692.5) <0.0001
Arterial wave reflections
Pb, mm Hg 13 (10–17) 11 (10–13) 0.031
AIx, % 10.1±9.6 1.0±8.6 <0.0001*
GRC 0.35±0.07 0.32±0.06 0.015*

AIx indicates augmentation index; cfPWV, carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; e‐aPWV, estimated aortic pulse wave velocity calculated based on age and mean arterial pressure; EVA, early vascular aging; GRC, global reflection coefficient; IQR, interquartile range; PAC, proximal aortic compliance; Pb, reflected pressure wave amplitude; Pf, forward pressure wave amplitude; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; TAC, total arterial compliance; and Zc, aortic characteristic impedance.

*

Comparison made using a t test.

Comparison made using a χ2 test.

Comparison made using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test.