Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;12(8):e028116. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028116

Table 3.

Summary of Multivariable Linear Regression Models Comparing Arterial Hemodynamics Between Women With History of Preeclampsia and Controls

Hemodynamic variable Preeclampsia vs controls, aMD (95% CI) P value
Brachial blood pressure
SBP, mm Hg +7.2 (1.1 to 13.3) 0.021
DBP, mm Hg +6.9 (2.8 to 10.9) 0.001
MAP, mm Hg +8.0 (3.2 to 12.8) 0.001
Brachial PP, mm Hg +0.4 (−4.7 to 5.4) 0.888
Central blood pressure
Central SBP, mm Hg +10.0 (3.0 to 17.2) 0.006
Central DBP, mm Hg +7.0 (2.9 to 11.01) 0.001
Central PP, mm Hg +3.2 (−2.4 to 8.6) 0.260
Aortic stiffness
cfPWV, m/s +0.42 (0.007 to 0.82) 0.047
Steady arterial load
SVR, dyne×s/m5 +326.4 (170.2 to 482.6) <0.0001
Pulsatile arterial load
Zc,, dyne×s/m5 −1.8 (−26.0 to 22.4) 0.881
PAC, 10−6 cm4/dyne −0.35 (−2.13 to 1.44) 0.701
TAC, mL/mm Hg −0.12 (−0.35 to 0.10) 0.290
Pf, mm Hg −1.4 (−6.2 to 3.4) 0.558
Arterial wave reflections
Pb, mm Hg +1.8 (0.2 to 3.5) 0.033
GRC +0.05 (0.02 to 0.08) 0.0004
AIx, % +8.7 (4.6 to 12.8) <0.0001

Results are presented as the aMD for each hemodynamic measure between women with preeclampsia and controls, after adjustment for confounders in the multivariable model. The reported P value refers to the comparison of each hemodynamic measure between the two groups. AIx indicates augmentation index; aMD, adjusted mean difference; cfPWV, carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GRC, global reflection coefficient; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PAC, proximal aortic compliance; Pb, reflected pressure wave amplitude; Pf, forward pressure wave amplitude; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SVR, systemic vascular resistance; TAC, total arterial compliance; and Zc, aortic characteristic impedance.