Skip to main content
. 2023 May 16;14:1175555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175555

Table 2.

Summary of mediation analysis.

Hypothesized relationships Direct effect Indirect effect t 95% CI Value of p Conclusion
LLCI ULCI
H1: NMP → SA 0.541*** 16.512 0.4768 0.6057 0.000 H1 Supported***
H2.1: NMP → SMTU 0.231** 4.597 0.1323 0.3298 0.000 H2.1 Supported***
H2.2: NMP → DGB −0.002 −0.033 −0.1237 0.1196 0.973 H2.2 Not Supported
H3.1: SMTU → SA 0.070* 2.199 0.0074 0.1322 0.028* H3.1 Supported*
H3.2: DGB → SA 0.022 0.8446 −0.0289 0.0724 0.398 H3.2 Not Supported
H4: NMP → SA 0.525*** 15.709 0.4594 0.5909 0.000 H4.1 Supported *** H4.2 Not Supported
NMP
SMTU 0.0161 0.0023 0.0033 H4.1: Partial Mediation
DGB −0.0000 −0.0042 0.0045 H4.2: No Mediation
SA
Squared multiple correlations (R2)
SMTU 0.0469 F (1, 430) = 21.139, p = 0.000
DGB 0.0000 F (1, 430) = 0.011, p = 0.973
SA 0.3970 F (3, 428) = 93.919, p = 0.000

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

NMP: Nomophobia, SA: Smartphone Addiction, SMTU: Social Media Tools Usage, DGB: Digital Gaming Behavior.

Unstandardized coefficients were reported. BC Bootstrap with 5,000 samples and 95% CI.