Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 20;24(3):178–184. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.618

TABLE 3.

Correlation between CysC/Cr and variants using linear regression analysis.

Variant Univariate models Multivariate model (R = 0.68)
p‐Value R p‐Value c.c. (95%CI)
Female gender <0.001 0.44 <0.001 0.20 (0.12–0.29)
Older age <0.001 0.58 <0.001 0.01 (0.005–0.011)
BMD in LS 0.16 0.14
BMD in FN 0.08 0.17
T‐score in LS 0.12 0.14
T‐score in FN 0.11 0.16
Presence of lifestyle‐related diseases 0.17 0.11
Presence of hyper fall‐ability 0.10 0.12
Presence of CKD ≥ Grade3a <0.001 0.16 0.12 −0.07 (−0.15–0.02)
Presence of cognitive impairment <0.05 0.17 0.6 −0.04 (−0.18–0.10)
Antiosteoporotic drug administration <0.001 0.44 0.94 −0.003 (−0.09–0.08)
Vitamin D supplementation 0.75 0.03
Glucocorticoid steroid administration 0.63 0.04
Presence of polypharmacy <0.05 0.16 0.20 0.05 (−0.03–0.12)
Presence of prevalent MOF <0.001 0.48 <0.05 0.10 (0.02–0.19)

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; c.c., correlation coefficients; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CysC/Cr, serum cystatin C‐to‐creatinine ratio; FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine; MOF, major osteoporotic fracture.