Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2022 Jul 26;100:102094. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102094

Table 2:

The quantitative evaluation for ablation study without discriminator (w/o Discr.), without perceptual loss (w/o Perc.), and without dual-path training schema (Dual) in the arterial phase (AP), portal phase (PP), and delayed phase (DP)

Phase PSNR SSIM MSE SNU
w/o Discr.-AP 18.96 ± 1.72 0.64 ± 0.05 243 ± 16 0.31 ± 0.16
w/o Discr.-PP 19.44 ± 1.69 0.69±0.05 232 ± 23 0.37 ± 0.35
w/o Discr.-DP 16.95 ± 1.39 0.65 ± 0.07 296 ± 38 0.53 ± 0.12
w/o Perc.-AP 18.36 ± 1.50 0.63 ± 0.06 234 ± 44 0.42 ± 0.34
w/o Perc.-PP 18.77 ± 1.43 0.66 ± 0.08 221 ± 21 0.39 ± 0.59
w/o Perc.-DP 16.86 ± 1.32 0.64 ± 0.06 257 ± 16 0.52 ± 0.38
w/o Dual.-AP 19.05 ± 3.04 0.67±0.07 198 ± 22 0.33 ± 0.25
w/o Dual.-PP 19.47 ± 2.74 0.66 ± 0.07 238 ± 36 0.49 ± 0.35
w/o Dual.-DP 16.42 ± 2.36 0.60 ± 0.08 246 ± 14 0.52 ± 0.41
Proposed-AP 19.09±1.88 0.63 ± 0.05 194±19 0.25±0.09
Proposed-PP 19.79±1.17 0.65 ± 0.05 216±29 0.34±0.16
Proposed-DP 17.23±1.59 0.65±0.05 244±22 0.46±0.14