Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 30;21(4):951–987. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666220217152617

Table 2. Sleep-promoting effect of exogenous melatonin.

Author Study
Design
Aim DX Subjects Variables
Measured
Dose Timing Duration General Results
Antón-Tay et al., 1971
[8]
Case series To study the effects of exo-Mel administration to humans HS n=11
males 5
age 18-25
EEG
Subjective sleepiness
0.25 mg/K, 1.25 mg/KG (iv) Not specified Single dose EEG activity slight deactivation,
↑ % and amplitude of alpha rhythm, Sleepiness, wellbeing
MORNING ADMINISTRATION
Vollrath et al., 1981 [5] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To evaluate the effects of exo-MEL at “low dosages using as form of application nasal spray (ns) HS n=10
males 6, females 4
age 28.8 and 26.5 respectively
Subjective sleepiness 1.7 mg (ns) 9:00-10:00 single dose ↑ Sleepiness
(9/10 subjects fell asleep)
Dollins et al., 1993
[196]
Double-blind placebo-controlled
Latin square design
To determine whether lower acute doses of melatonin than have previously been investigated have sedative-like effects on behavior and if such effects are dose-related. HS n=20
males 20
age 25 ± 1.47
(range 19-39)
MEL levels, oral temperature, cognition, SSS, POMS 10mg, 20mg, 40mg, or 80mg 11:45 single dose All doses: ↓ Oral temperature, correct responses in auditory vigilance and self-reported vigor, ↑ response latency, self-reported fatigue, confusion, sleepiness
Dollins et al., 1994 [89] * Double-blind placebo-controlled
Latin square design
To evaluate if exo-MEL at physiological doses may induce short-term behavioral effects. HS n=20
males 20
age
23.05±4.22
(range 18-24)
MEL levels, oral temperature, TST SSS, SOL, cognition, POMS, 0.1mg,0.3mg, 1.0mg, 10 mg 11:45 single dose All doses= ↓ SOL, subjective vigor, ↑ TST, Sleepiness, self-reported fatigue.
Doses of 1.0-10 mg=
↓ oral temperature, correct responses in auditory vigilance and reaction time
Mishima et al., 1997 [198] * Single-blind randomized crossover To study acute hypnotic and hypothermic effects induced by daytime administration of exo-MEL with simultaneous monitoring of serum MEL concentration HS n= 6
males 6
age 22.5±19
CBT, SL (measured during a MSLT), serum MEL concentration 3mg or 9mg 09:30 single dose ↓ CBT (3 mg, 9 mg)
↓ SL (9 mg)
Hughes & Badia, 1997 [9] * Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To investigate the ability of three different doses of melatonin (1 mg, 10 mg, and 40 mg) to promote sleep in a moderate-duration daytime sleep opportunity. HS n=8
males 8
age range 18-30
CBT, PSG (SL, SWS_L, REM_L, TST, WASO, % of S1, S2. S3, S4 and REM, ss density, movement time, wake time, AW), pulse rate, blood pressure, cognition 1 mg,
10 mg
40 mg
10:00 Single dose (each treatment) All dosages:
↓ SL, Stage 3-4, WASO and CBT, ↑ Stage 2, TST.
Doses of 10 mg and 40 mg:
↓REM latency, ↑ latency to stage 3-4, TST.
Van Den Heuvel et al., 1998 [197] Double-blind placebo-controlled counterbalanced To evaluate the effects of daytime melatonin infusion in young adults HS n= 24
males 12
age range 19-28
(8 subjects for dose)
Subjective sleepiness, central and peripheric temperature Iv 0.04, 0.08, 8.00 μg h-1 kg-1 10:00 Single dose (each treatment) High dose (supraphysiological):
↑ hand temperature, sleepiness
↓ raising of central temperature
Van Den Heuvel et al., 1999 [19] Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled To exam the effects of exo-MEL levels on body temperatures and sleepiness when administered with a rapid systemic onset. HS n = 8
males 4
age 23.9 ±0.7
Subjective sleepiness, central and peripheric temperature iv 3, 10, and 30 μg 10:00 Single dose (each treatment) All doses (physiological levels):
↑ hand temperature
↓ raising of central temperature
Matsumoto, 1999 [10]* Single-blind crossover To evaluate the effects of 10mg MEL administered at 10:00 on a diurnal sleep episode (from 11:00 to 19:00 following a full night of sleep. HS n=6
males 6
age 23.7±1.3
PSG (sleep period time, SL, TST, SE, AW, % and duration of W, S1, S2, S3, S4, REM. Wake time, REM_L, N° REM periods, REM period and cycle length) CBT, Sleepiness 10 mg 10:00 single dose ↑ TST, SE, Sleepiness, %, and duration of REM and S2.
↓ AW, % and duration of W.
No changes in CBT
Aeschbach, D.,, 2009 [199] * Double-blind placebo-controlled and crossover to test an experimental skin patch designed to deliver melatonin such that plasma levels steadily increase for 6-8 h, and thereby counteract the increasing circadian wake drive and improve daytime sleep. HS n=8
males 4
age 27.8±3.6,
(range 24-34)
EEG, (TST, SE, SL, SL_REM, WASO, S1, S2, SWS, REM sleep), EEG spectra, plasma MEL, CBT, sleepiness (KSS) and cognition 2.1 mg (transdermal) 08:00 single dose ↓ CBT and WASO
↑ REM sleep, SE, TST, S2.
Spectral analysis:
↓ density in 2.5-6.5 Hz, ↑ density in 13.25-13.5 HZ.
Lieberman et al., 1984 [6] Double-blind counterbalanced To examine the ability of oral melatonin, given during the daylight hours in pharmacological quantities, to modify various aspects of behavior HS n=14
males 14
age range 18-45
POMS, SSS, Cognition 240 mg (three doses of 80 mg) Split dose at 12.00, 13.00, 14.00 single dose ↑ Fatigue, confusion, Sleepiness, response time
↓ Vigor, number of errors in cognitive tests
Dijk et al., 1995
[202] *
Placebo-controlled crossover To document the immediate and vigilance state-specific effects of exo-MEL on EEG activity during daytime sleep. HS n = 8
males 6
age 22.4
(range 20-26)
PSG (SL, TST, SE, REM_L, percentage of S1, S2, SWS, REM, and spectral analysis. 5 mg 12:30 Single dose Spectral analysis:
↑ 13.75-14.0 Hz, ↓ 15.25-16.5 Hz and 2.2.5-5.0 Hz (In the first 2 h). No changes in sleep architecture, SL or SE
Nave et al., 1995 [11]* Double-blind balanced Latin square design To investigate the effects of exo-MEL on napping during early evening hours (before the nocturnal rise in endogenous melatonin when sleep propensity is low) HS n= 20
age 24.6 ± 2.7
PSG (SL, TST, S1, S2, S3/S4, REM) 3mg, 6 mg 16:00- 17:30 Single dose by protocol ↑ TST, S2, SQ
↓ SL
Nave et al., 1996 [131] Double-blind, randomized
partially repeated Latin square design.
To investigate whether 10 mg of flumazenil (BDZ antagonist) can block the hypothermic effects of 3 mg melatonin HS n=6
males 6
age 24.5±0.9
PSG (SL, TST S1, S2), spectral analysis, CBT, Sleepiness 3mg 12:00 Single dose ↑ S1, S2, TST and power density in frequency bands: 1-3Hz and 4-7 Hz, and sleepiness
↓ SL and CBT
(BDZ antagonist does not interfere with the MEL effects)
Reid et al., 1996 [12]* Double-blind placebo-controlled, crossover To explore the relationship between hypothermic and hypnotic effects of melatonin HS n=16
males 6
age 20.3±2.4
PSG (SOL1, SOL2) CBT 5 mg 14:00 single dose ↓ CBT, SOL1, SOL2
Cajochen et al., 1996 [201] Double-blind crossover To evaluate the acute effect of exo-MEL on EEG power density during waking. HS n = 8, males 8 Experiment 1: age 27 ± 4, Experiment 2: age 24.8 ± 3.5 Sleepiness (VAS, Akerstedt Sleepiness Scale), waking EEG 5 mg Exp 1: 18:00, Exp 2: 13:00 sigle-dose ↑ Sleepiness and 5.25-9 Hz density. No changes in SWS, sleep spindle and beta band
Kräuchi, Cajochen, & Wirz-Justice, 1997 [135] * Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover Both MEL and postural changes have thermoregulator sequelae. To evaluate their relationship to subjective sleepiness. HS n = 8
males 8
age 25±4
range 21-31
Waking EEG, Temperature (superficial and central), sleepiness (VAS), heart rate 5 mg 13:00 single dose ↑ Subjective Sleepiness, distal temperature, 5.25-9 HZ power density in the waking EEG
↓ central temperature
Gilbert et al., 1999 [13]* Double-blind counterbalanced compared the thermoregulatory and
soporific effects of temazepam with those of melatonin.
HS n =20
males 13 females 7
age 23.5 ± 0.4
CBT, peripheral temperature, PSG (SL), heart rate 5 mg 14:00 Single session ↓ SL and CTB (with both exo-MEL and tamazepam). Temporal relationship between minimum SL and the maximum rate of decline in CBT
Satomura et al., 2001 [137] * Single-blind randomized To assess the hypnotic action by administering exo-MEL during the day HS n =7
males 7
age 23.7±1.7
EEG (SL, TST, SE, WASO, REM_L, S1, S2), CBT 1,3,6 mg 13:30 single dose ↑ TST, SE, S2 (1mg, 3mg, 6 mg)
↓ CBT (1mg,3mg)
Rogers et al., 2003 [200] Double-blind randomized crossover To compare neurobehavioural performance effects following the daytime administration of exo-MEL and temazepam HS n= 16
males 6 females 10
age 21.4 ± 0.6
Cognition, sleepiness (VAS) 5 mg 12:00 single -dose ↑ Sleepiness, ↓ performance in unpredictable tracking, spatial memory and vigilance tasks.
Cramer et al., 1974 [203] * Placebo-controlled crossover To study the effects of MEL in healthy young male volunteers HS n=15
males 15
PSG (SOL, S3_L, REM_L, NREM_L. TST, % of S1, S2, S3/4, REM, sleep stages), refreshing sleep (MMQ), mental state, 5-HIAA, adenosine 3’,5’monophosphate 50 mg iv 21:30 single dose ↓SOL
James et al., 1987
[18]*
Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized To report the findings of the acute effects of orally administered exo-MEL in HS HS n=10
males 7
females 3
age 29.9
PSG (SOL, SE, REM_L, TST, duration and % of Delta and REM), DSQ, sleepiness (SSS), anxiety, and mood 1mg, 5mg 22:45 Single dose ↑ REM_L in the 5mg condition compared to 1mg and placebo condition.
Waldhauser et al., 1990 [204] Double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group To determine the effects of exo-MEL on sleep induction, sleep maintenance, sleep architecture and objective and subjective awakening quality in induced insomnia HS n=20
males 10
females 10
age 26.4 ± 4.8
PSG (Awake till sleep onset, SL, TSP, TST, SE, AW, WASO, REM_L, stage shifts), sleep quality, awakening quality and somatic complaints, cognition, mood, drowsiness. 80 mg 21:00 Single dose ↓ SL, N° awakenings, S1.
↑ SE, S2, cognition and alertness (morning after MEL treatment)
Ferini-Strambi et al., 1993 [17] * Single-blind placebo controlled To compare the effects of exo-MEL with those of a benzodiazepine hypnotic
[triazolam (TRI) 0.125 mg] at a low dose in healthy volunteers.
HS n=6
males 6
age 25.3 ± 3.6
PSG (TST, SL, WASO, AW, SE, Sleep stages %, REM-L, REM periods, stage shifts/hour CAP variables), DSQ, SQ 100 mg 22:30 single dose No changes in classical PSG variables
↑ sleep quality.
MEL, TRI and MEL + TRI = ↓ CAP cycles, MEL in comparison with baseline= longer Phase B (lesser arousal).
Zhdanova et al., 1995 [14]* Double-blind placebo-controlled counterbalanced To examine the induction of PSG recorded sleep by MEL given later in the evening close to the times of endogenous melatonin release and habitual sleep onset. HS n=6
males 6
age 26.5 ± 1.3
PSG (SOL, S2_L, REM_L), 0.3 or 1.0 mg 18:00, 20:00, 21:00 3 sessions by timing ↓ SOL, S2_L (all doses and all time points).
Zhdanova et al., 1996 [15]* Double-blind placebo-controlled counterbalanced To characterize the effects of augmented circulating MEL levels within the physiologic nocturnal range on PSG parameters HS n=12
males 12
age 28.5±1.8
PSG (W, S1, S2, S3, S4, REM, SOL, REM_L, S2_L, WASO, SE, TST), Sleepiness (SSS), cognition and mood (POMS) 0.3, 1.0 mg 21:00 (2-4 h before sleep) 3 sessions ↓ SOL, S2L
↑ SE
No effect on other sleep parameters, no effects on cognition and sleepiness the day after exo-MEL treatment.
Attenburrow
et al., 1996 [16] *
Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To investigate the effect of exo-MEL on PSG measured sleep in normal, middle-aged volunteers when administered 2 hours before the habitual sleep time HS n=15
males 4
age 53.9 range 41-67
PSG (TIB, TSP, actual sleep time, SE, SOL, WASO, total movement time, S2_L, SWS_L, S1, S2, SWS, NREM, REM, REM_L), LSEQ 0.3 mg 1.0 mg 2 hours before BT Single dose 1 mg = ↑ TST, SE, NREM, REM_L
Stone et al., 2000 [208] * Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To establish the effect of melatonin upon nocturnal and evening sleep. HS Exp1. n= 8 males 8 age 23.4 (range 20-30)
Exp 2. n= 6
males 6, age 26.5 (range 21-31)
EEG (TST, SE, SOL, REM/non-REM ratio, L_SWS, L_REM, REM periods, AW, stage shifts, Awake (min), Duration and % of S1,S2, S3+4, REM, Awake), SQ, ESS, CBT,DLMO (acute effect), Cognition 0.1mg, 0.5mg, 1.0mg, 5.0mg, 10 mg 18:30 and 23:30 single dose Exo-MEL at 18:00 (all doses) =↑TST, SE, S2, REM periods, stage shifts
↓ WA
Exo-MEL at 23:30 = ↓ S3 (5mg), ↓CBT (0.1 mg), ↑ SL
Pires et al., 2001 [207]* Double-blind placebo-controlled to evaluate the acute effects of single low doses of exo-MEL given to HS in the evening. HS n=6
males 6
age range 22-24
PSG (TST, SL, SE, WASO, percentage of S1, S2, S3/4, REM, REM_L), SQ, POMS, SSS, Cognition 0.3 or 1.0 mg 18:00, 20:00, 21:00 single dose ↓ SL, (18:00 and 20:00),
↑ SL (21:00)
↓ S1 (20: 00)
↑REM_L (0.3 mg, 18:00)
↑ SL (0.3mg, 21:00)
Ribeiro et al., 2004 [205] * placebo-controlled to evaluate SOT in HS taking exo-MEL using 2 different criteria of sleep latency: the Rechtschaffen and Kales and the 10 minutes of uninterrupted sleep HS n=45, males 45
age 28 ± 5
(PLA n=10
MEL n=30)
PSG (SL, SE, sleep architecture, REM_L and density). SL evaluated through the Rechtschaffen and Kales criteria (1.5 minutes of S1) and the 10 minutes of uninterrupted sleep criteria) 10 mg 1 h before BT 28 days ↓ SL (using the 10 min of uninterrupted sleep criteria)
Advance in SOT
Arbon et al.,
2015
[206] *
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover To study the effects of pro-longed-release exo-MEL, temazepam and zolpidem on the spectral composition of the EEG during nocturnal sleep in healthy middle-aged men and women. HS N = 16
Males 12
Age 58.8 ± 2.9
PSG (SOL, REM_L, duration of S1, S2, S3, S4, NREM, REM, TST, SPT, SE, WASO, AW), spectral analysis Plasma melatonin and aMT6S (acute), SQQ, KSS 2 mg (PR) 21:00 (2 h before BT) Single dose (each treatment) Exo-MEL = Minor reduction in SWA in the first third of the night. No changes in PSG measures compared to PLA. No effect on SQQ or KSS
MULTIPLE TIMING
Nickelsen et al., 1989 [7] * Double-blind placebo-controlled To study the sedative potency of high doses of exo-MEL at different times of the day. HS n=25
males 14
age 30.4±6.2
females 11
age 30±7.9
Sleepiness (SSS), sedative effect perception, sleep-log (SOL, TST, AW) 50 mg 19.00 or 9:00 Single dose ↑ Tiredness and sedating perception only in morning administration
Tzischinsky & Lavie, 1994
[210]
Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To evaluate the hypnotic effect of exo-MEL using an ultrashort sleep-wake paradigm HS n=8
males 8
age 27.06±3.7
PSG (sleep propensity[sp]) = averaging total sleep time (sum of stages 1, 2, 3/4 and REM sleep) at each of the 72 trials)
spectral analysis, Temperature, Sleepiness (VAS).
5 mg 12:00, 17:00, 19:00, 21:00 Single dose (each treatment) ↑ SP time-dependent:
12 h = ↑ midafternoon sp (peak at 16 h) and delayed the nocturnal increase in sp from 22 to 24h.
17 h = ↑ sp (peak:19h)
19:00 h = ↑ sp (peak at 21h)
21h = faster ↑ sp (peak at 22h)
All trials = ↑ Subjective sleepiness, ↓ T° at 12,17,19 h
Wyatt et al., 2006 [209] Double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group To investigate the effects of a physiologic and pharmacologic dose of exo-MEL on SL and SE in sleep episodes initiated across a full range of circadian phases. HS n=36
males 21
age range 18-30
EEG (SE, TST, Latency to consolidated sleep -LCS-, REM % and SWS%), CBT, Plasma MEL profile. 0.3 or 5.0 mg 30 min before 6.67h sleep period during forced desynchrony 21 days ↑ SE during the sleep episodes out of endogenous MEL release, no changes in SL, LCS, CBT, % of SWS or REM sleep.
INSOMNIA
James et al.,
1990 [33]
Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To report the finding of the acute effects of orally administered exo-MEL at bedtime in patients with persistent complaints of insomnia Initiating or maintaining sleep Disorder n=10, males 4 age= 33.4 (range 20-57) PSG (REM_L, REM period, duration and % of REM, TST, SE, SWS, % of movement time, SOT), subjective sleepiness (SSS), SQ, DSQ, mood-rating scales 1mg or 5mg 22:45 1 session ↑REM latency (1 mg), and SQ
MacFarlane
et al., 1991 [211]
Single Blind placebo-controlled crossover To determine the effectiveness of consecutive single evening oral doses of exo-MEL in the initiation and maintenance of sleep /chronic insomnia. Chronic Insomnia n=13
males 8
age range 25-65
Subjective TST, awareness of MEL vs.
Placebo, alertness
75 mg 22:00 1 week ↑TST and Subjective alertness
Haimov et al., 1995 [20] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To investigate the effects of exo-MEL replacement therapy on MEL-deficient elderly insomniacs. Chronic Insomnia Independently living n= 8, males 4, age 73.1±3.9
Institutionalized n= 18, males 6, age 81.1±8.9
Actigraphic TST, SE, SL, Mean activity level 2mg,
PR
(P-1w)
FR
(F-1w)
2 h before the desired bedtime 1 week-2 month ↑ SE and ↓Mean level activity in PR-MEL vs. placebo (after 2 months of treatment).
↓ SL and ↑ sleep maintenance in FR-MEL and PR-MEL
Ellis et al., 1996 [30] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To evaluate the hypnotic effect of exo-MEL in subjects with psychophysiological insomnia psychophysiological Insomnia n= 15
males 9
age 46±11 range 32-67
sleep log (BT, SOT, first wake, final wake, get up time, TST, time wake time in bed, SE), SQ, subjective sleep duration, daytime sleepiness, mood 5 mg 20:00 1 week No changes
Lushington et al., 1997 [29] Double-blind placebo-controlled, crossover to explore the short-term effects of exo-MEL on CBT, SL and subjective vigor and affect in aged women. Sleep maintenance Insomnia Insomnia patients n=20
HS n= 10 All females
age 65.2±7.4
CBT, PSG (focused on SL to S1 and S2), sleepiness and mood (VAS) 5 mg 14:00 single dose ↓ CBT, SL (stage 1 and 2) in both groups
Hughes et al., 1998 [21] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To assess the sleep-promoting effect of exo-MEL replacement delivery strategies in age-related sleep-maintenance insomnia. Age-related sleep maintenance insomnia n=14
males 5
age 70.29±1.8
DLMO, CBT, PSG (TST, SE, WASO, SL, TBT, SPT, WT, amount of sleep S1, S2, S3, S4 and REM, REM_L) Actigraphy (TST, SE. WASO, SL), sleep log, SQ, POMS, sleepiness and fatigue (VAS) 0.5 mg PR and IR Early: IR 30m before BT
Continuous: PR 30m before BT, Late: IR 4h after BT
Placebo: 30m before BT 4h after BT
Four two- week trials with two weeks of washout ↓ SOL (PSG)
↓ CBT
No changes in TST, WASO, SE, other PSG parameters, nor in subjective measurements or in DLMO profiles
Dawson et al., 1998 [31] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To determine whether nocturnal exo-MEL replacement, using a transbuccal delivery system, would lower core temperature and improve sleep in insomniac patients Sleep maintenance insomnia ICSD criteria n=12
age 65.67 ±1.68
PSG (TST, SOL, REM_L, EMA, percentage time awake, SE, Stage changes, SOT, WASO), spectral analysis, body temperature, aMT6S 0.5 mg transbuccal patch 19:00 4 consecutive nights ↑ aMT.6S
↑ WASO in the first half of the night on night 4 and in whole night on night 3.
↓ Body temperature
Zhdanova et al., 2001 [22] Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized To examine the ability of similar, physiological exo-MEL doses to restore nighttime MEL levels and SE in insomniac subjects over 50 years old. Chronic Insomnia Patients n=15
age >50
HS n=15
age >50
PSG (SOL, TST, SE, WASO, AW, duration of S1, S2, S3, S4 and REM, REM_L, SWS_L), CBT, MEL 0.1 mg,
0.3 mg,
3.0 mg
30 min before BT 1 week ↑ SE (3 doses) only in insomnia patients
↓CBT (3mg)
Almeida Montes et al., 2003 [32] Double-blind placebo-controlled crossover To assess the hypnotic effect of exo-MEL in primary insomnia. Primary Insomnia DSM-IV criteria n=10
males 6
age 50±12.7
range 30-72
PSG (duration and latency of S1, S2, S3, REM, AW, TST, average length of NREM-REM cycle and SE), subjective quality and amount of sleep, Sleep log 0.3mg, 1.0 mg PR 1h before BT 1 week for each treatment No changes
Baskett et al., 2003 [213] Double-blind placebo controlled randomized crossover To determine whether exo-MEL will improve quality of sleep in healthy older people with
age-related sleep maintenance problems.
HS
(normal vs. problem sleepers)
Normal sleepers= n=20
Problem sleepers n=20
Age 71.7 ± 4.9
range 65-84
PSQI, LSEQ, sleep log (diary awakenings, quality scale, alertness scale), actigraphy (TIB, Sleep time, SL, AW, SE) 5 mg BT 4 weeks No changes in outcomes of interest.
↓ AW in normal sleepers
Leger et al., 2004 [37] Placebo-controlled crossover To examine the excretion of aMT6s in insomnia patients aged 55 years and its relation with the subsequent response to exo-MEL therapy. Primary Insomnia DSM-IV criteria n=396
males 330
age 68 ± 8 range 55-93
aMT6s, LSEQ domains: GTS, SQ, AFS, BFW 2 mg 21:00-23:00 3 weeks Proportion of response in “Low excretors” response to MEL (58% [65/112] was major than in “normal excretors” 47% [122/260] in SQ and BFW
Wade et al., 2007 [23] Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized
parallel
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a prolonged-release exo-MEL formulation (PR-melatonin; Circadin 2mg) in insomnia patients aged 55 years and older. Primary Insomnia based on the Sleep History Questionnaire (SHQ) n = 334 (MEL= 169, PLA = 165) males 113
age aged: 65.7 ± 6.4
LSEQ (GTS, SQ, AFS, BFW), PSQI, subjective quality of day and quality of life, CGI, WHO-5 2 mg PR 2 hours before bedtime 3 weeks ↑ SQ, BFW, WHO-5.
↓ SL (24.3 min vs. 12.9 min), measured through the PSQI
Lemoine et al., 2007 [24] multi-center randomized placebo-controlled parallel group To assess the efficacy and safety of exo-MEL in improving sleep quality and morning alertness in insomnia patients 55 years and older Primary Insomnia DSM-IV criteria n=170
males 58
age 55-93
MEL-PR n=82
PLA n=88
LSEQ, QON, QOD, BWSQ 2mg PR 1-2 h before BT (between 21:00-22.00) 3 weeks ↑ SQ, BFW, QON.
No withdrawal symptoms
Luthringer et al., 2009 [25] Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group To investigate the effects of PR exo-MEL 2mg on sleep and subsequent daytime psychomotor performance Primary Insomnia DSM-IV criteria n=40
males 24
MEL (n=20)
Males
13 (65%)
Age 59.6 ± 2.9
PLA (n=20)
Males 11 (55%) Age 61.9± 4.8
PSG (SOL, TST, REM, NREM, SE, Number of awakenings, WASO, duration and % of sleep stages REM, NREM, SWS, REM_L, spectral analysis), LSEQ, subjective improvement SQ (VAS), cognition 2 mg PR 2 h before BT
(between 21:00 and 23:00)
3 weeks ↓SOL,
↑ SQ and cognitive performance
Garzón et al., 2009 [28] Prospective,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover
to evaluate the effect of melatonin administration
on sleep and behavioral disorders in the elderly
and the facilitation of the discontinuation of regular
hypnotic drugs.
Primary Insomnia DSM-IV criteria or transient sleep disorder n=22, males 7, age 75.8, females 15 age 74.3 NHSMI, GDS, GAS 5 mg BT (aprox 23:00) 8 weeks ↑ SQ, nine out of 14 subjects receiving hypnotic drugs were able to discontinue this treatment
during melatonin but not placebo administration.
Wade et al., 2010 [26] Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized parallel group To investigate whether exo-MEL PR efficacy is related to low endogenous MEL levels or age. And to investigate the maintenance of efficacy and the safety of exo-MEL PR beyond the acute treatment. Primary Insomnia (DSM-IV criteria) n=746
MEL=373
Age>65 (143)
Low excretors (88)
PLA=373
Age>65 (150)
Low excretors (90)
SL, PSQI, CGI, WHO-5 2 mg PR 2 before BT (between 21:00 and 22:00) Short-term: 3 weeks
Long-term: 26 weeks
↓ SL (in elderly regardless of the endogenous MEL)
Low excretors:
aged 18-80 years ↓ PSQIc5; ↑WHO5
Age>65
↓ PSQI_c2, ↑sleep maintenance and PSQI total score. The effects were maintained over the 6 months protocol.
Wade et al., 2011 [27] Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized To evaluate the age cut-off for response to exo-MEL PR and the long-term maintenance of efficacy and safety in subsets of patients aged 18-54 and 55-80 years. Primary Insomnia, DSM-IV criteria n=722
age 18-54 (n=144)
age 55-80 (n=578).
SL, PSQI, CGI, WHO-5 2 mg PR 2 h before bedtime 3 weeks-24 weeks ↓SL (sleep diary) (55-80 range),
↓ SL (PSQI_c2), PSQI total score (whole sample)
↑WHO-5, CGI (whole sample)
Chung et al., 2016
[214]
Retrospective To investigate patients’ satisfaction rate with exo-MEL PR when they took it after their sleep-wake cycle was set. Primary Insomnia ICSD criteria 2° edition n=44
males 27
age 65.9 ± 8.6
sleep indices extracted from interview (BT, SOT, SOFFT, SL, TIB) at baseline, satisfaction with treatment 2 mg PR 2 h before BT 4 weeks Satisfaction with MEL-PR use in 66% of patients. reduction of sleeping pill dosage by at least 50% in 44% of patients.
Complete discontinuation of previous sleeping pills in 20% of patients. No significant differences in sleep indices between patients satisfied vs. dissatisfied
Xu et al., 2020 [212] Double-blind placebo-controlled randomized
parallel
To determine the efficacy of exo-MEL for sleep disturbances in patients with middle-aged primary insomnia Primary insomnia, DSM-IV criteria MEL (n=29)
Males
12 (41.38%)
Age 57.24 ± 5.59
PLA (n=32)
Males 17 (53.13%)
Age 56.53± 4.65
PSG (SL, REM_L, TST, SE, Micro-arousal index, WASO, Early wake (min), % of NREM S1, S2, S3, REM), PSQI, ISI, ESS, 3 mg IR 1 h before BT 4 weeks ↓ Early wake time, S2 sleep

Conventions: ← advance, → delay, ↑ increase, ↓ decrease, * plotted in Fig. (3b).