TABLE 2.
Variables | Cutoff values | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC (95% CI) | Youden index | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 3 | 0.418 | 0.896 | 0.852 | 0.926 (0.885–0.968) | 0.748 | 0.001 |
Model 2 | 0.569 | 0.867 | 0.815 | 0.894 (0.844–0.945) | 0.682 | 0.051 |
Model 1 | 1.268 | 0.792 | 0.907 | 0.897 (0.851–0.942) | 0.699 | 0.049 |
HIF-1αadj | 1.220 | 0.595 | 0.907 | 0.829 (0.769–0.890) | 0.503 | 0.686 |
WBC | 10.045 | 0.870 | 0.699 | 0.796 (0.736–0.856) | 0.570 | 0.174 |
BUN | 6.035 | 0.796 | 0.832 | 0.847 (0.794–0.901) | 0.629 | 0.889 |
HIF-1α | 2.429 | 0.630 | 0.647 | 0.614 (0.530–0.699) | 0.277 | <0.001 |
qSOFA | 0.500 | 0.994 | 0.537 | 0.843 (0.780–0.905) | 0.531 | Ref. |
HIF-1αadj = HIF-1α × Fio2/Spo2. Model 1, HIF-1αadj + BUN; model 2, HIF-1αadj + WBC; model 3, HIF-1αadj + WBC + BUN; P values: DeLong test was used for the comparison of different AUCs.
AUC, area under the curve; Ref., reference.