Table 10.
Studies | Sample size | Apical features | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAF- Apex | MAF- ApC | AF NO | ApC dimensions | ||
Wolf et al. [57] | 118 |
Number of accessory apical foramen only Frequency mean % MB ML DB DL 0 75.4% 72.0% 76.3% 96.6% 1 19.5% 21.2% 13.6% 3.4% 2 3.4% 5.1% 7.6% 3 0.8% 1.7% 1.7% 4 0.8% 0.8% |
|||
Versiani et al. [22] |
25 MR with middle mesial canal |
Range from 0.2 to 2.4 mm in MMCs |
Brazil Turky 1 3 (10.0%) 7 (38.9%) 2 10 (33.3%) 6 (33.3%) 3 16 (53.4) 5 (27.8%) 4 1 (3.3%) __ |
||
Wolf et al. [61] | 118 |
Average MR = 0.95 mm DR = 1.05 mm |
In MR, wide and narrow ApC width 0.24 and 0.30 mm and 0.39 and 0.46 mm in DR | ||
Moe et al. [60] | 75 |
in MB 1–6 (1.55 ± 0.84) in ML 1–4 (1.59 ± 0.86) in isthmus 0–3 (0.41 ± 0.70) in MMC 0–2 (0.23 ± 0.58) IN TOTAL 2–8 (3.78 ± 1.36) |
In MR, the largest and smallest ApC width at o.5 mm from the AF was 0.38 and 0.24, respectively | ||
Keles & Keskin [63] | 106 |
Average MB = 0.70 ± 0.51 ML = 0.52 ± 0.50 MMC = 1.34 ± 1.15 Whole MR = 0.85 mm |
|||
Asijavičienė et al. [66] | 60 |
Average MR = 1.014 mm DR = 1.089 mm All roots = 1.047 mm |
MR DR 1 81.48% 96.67% 2 16.67% 3.33% 3 1.85% ___ |
||
Keles et al. [24] |
Bifid MR (30) Non bifid MR (30) |
In both bifid and non-bifid, this distance ranged from 0—2 mm in MB 0—2.5 mm in ML |
Bifid Non bifid 2 16.7% 20% 3 33.3% 46.64% 4 10% 20% 5 20% 6.7% 6 16.7% 3.33% 7 3.3% 3.33% |
MAF- Apex Distance between major apical foramen and anatomical apex, MAF- ApC Distance between major and apical constriction (minor apical foramen), MC Mesial canals, DC Distal canal