Skip to main content
. 2023 May 30;25:60. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01661-0

Table 1.

Relative risk (95% CI) of breast cancer, observed in a Danish cohort of women aged 15–49 years and without a history of cancer, venous thromboembolism or fertility treatment [64]

(a) Relative risk according to time since use and duration of any type of hormonal contraception
Duration of use Relative risk of breast cancer (95% CI)
 < 1 yr since recent use 1 to < 5 yr since recent use 5–10 yr since recent use
 < 1 yr 0.96 (0.78–1.19) 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 1.01 (0.88–1.15)
1 to < 5 yr 1.04 (0.88–1.23) 1.06 (0.96–1.18) 1.07 (0.94–1.20)
5–10 yr 1.33 (1.11–1.59) 1.16 (1.02–1.33) 1.30 (1.06–1.58)
 > 10 yr 1.52 (1.17–1.98) 1.16 (0.89–1.49) NA
(b) Relative risk among women using current or recent P-only contraception
Current or recent P-only contraception Relative risk (95% CI)
Oral contraception NETA 1.00 (0.80–1.25)
LNG 1.93 (1.18–3.16)
DSG 1.18 (0.87–1.60)
Intra-uterine device LNG 1.21 (1.11–1.33)

Reference group: women who had never used hormonal contraception; Recent: defined as discontinuation of hormonal contraception within the previous 6 months; NA: not applicable due to too small number of events

CI confidence interval, DSG desogestrel, LNG levonorgestrel, NETA norethisterone acetate, yr year