Table 9.

Hierarchical regression analysis results with personality variables—part 2, Study 5

	Dependent variables
	Family exhaustion		Job performance		Job exhaustion		Alcohol use
	Step 1 $\beta$(SE)	Step 2 $\beta$(SE)	Step 1 $\beta$(SE)	Step 2 $\beta$(SE)	Step 1 $\beta$(SE)	Step 2 $\beta$(SE)	Step 1 $\beta$(SE)	Step 2 $\beta$(SE)
Constant	2.76** (.49)	2.27** (.53)	4.65** (.24)	4.22** (.06)	2.97** (.51)	2.96** (.57)	2.15** (.56)	2.36** (.64)
Conscientiousness	− .21* (.11)	− .15** (.11)	.50** (.05)	− .09* (.04)	− .23* (.11)	− .14 (.12)	.06 (.12)	.11 (.14)
Neuroticism	.65** (.07)	.37** (.08)	− .10** (.04)	− .05 (.04)	.68** (.08)	.52** (.09)	− .02 (.08)	− .07 (.10)
Managerial family load	-	.10 (.08)	-	− .05 (.04)	-	.07 (.09)	-	.08 (.10)
Cognitive family load	-	− .13 (.10)	-	.19** (.05)	-	− .20 (.11)	-	− .17 (.12)
Emotional family load	-	.38** (.06)	-	− .04 (.03)	-	.25** (.06)	-	.09 (.07)
$R^2$	.18	.26	.20	.22	.18	.22	.00	.01
$\mathrm{\Delta }{R}^2$	-	.08**	-	.03**	-	.04**	-	.01

N = 448. Alcohol use was measured by the typical number of days per week the participants drank alcohol

FWC family-to-work conflict, FWE family-to-work enrichment, Satis satisfaction

*p < .05; **p < .01