Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;25(5):euad101. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad101

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes by LAAC status

No-LAAC LAAC IPTW method P-value
n = 70 629 n = 1351 HR (95% CI)
Primary efficacy outcome 5.4% 2.5% 0.38 (0.17–0.88) 0.024
Primary safety outcome 6.8% 2.9% 0.39 (0.23–0.66) 0.001
Ischaemic stroke 1.9% 0.8% 0.20 (0.04–1.12) 0.067
Intracerebral haemorrhage 0.2% 0.0% NA <0.001
All-cause mortality 3.5% 2.6% 0.48 (0.19–1.23) 0.124
Major bleeding 6.0% 1.6% 0.34 (0.18–0.64) 0.001
Gastrointestinal bleeding 1.3% 0.2% 0.22 (0.06–0.79) 0.020
Blood transfusions 4.90% 2.10% 0.37 (0.19–0.73) 0.004
Admission for bleeding 2.30% 0.50% 0.20 (0.07–0.58) 0.003
Pericardiocentesis 0.30% 0.20% 0.44 (0.06–3.19) 0.42
Cardiac tamponade 0.30% 0.50% 1.33 (0.41–4.35) 0.635
Heart failure hospitalizations 13.2% 6.4% 0.52 (0.33–0.82) 0.005

The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, TIA, and/or mortality.

The primary safety outcome was a composite of major bleeding, pericardiocentesis, and pericardial tamponade.

Major bleeding was a composite of intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusion, and/or admission for bleeding.

Cumulative percentages using Kaplan–Meier curve time-to-event analysis.

Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to generate hazard ratios.

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; LAAC, left atrial appendage closure.