Table 5.

Full correlation matrix

	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.	9.	10.	11.	12.	13.	14.	15.
1. Antisaccade
2. SACT	0.35
3. FlankerDL	– 0.08	– 0.09
4. StroopDL	– 0.35	– 0.24	0.11
5. VA – color	0.41	0.35	– 0.12	– 0.28
6. VA – concentric	0.42	0.41	– 0.13	– 0.36	0.72
7. SymSpan	0.25	0.14	0.04	– 0.20	0.43	0.31
8. RotSpan	0.27	0.16	– 0.03	– 0.19	0.34	0.34	0.56
9. RunLetter	0.21	0.16	– 0.02	– 0.14	0.24	0.25	0.19	0.21
10. RunDigit	0.25	0.20	0.05	– 0.23	0.23	0.23	0.22	0.20	0.64
11. RAPM	0.33	0.12	– 0.09	– 0.14	0.44	0.40	0.33	0.33	0.29	0.26
12. Letter sets	0.27	0.10	0.04	– 0.20	0.28	0.29	0.31	0.18	0.36	0.43	0.39
13. Number series	0.28	0.08	0.01	– 0.26	0.42	0.36	0.33	0.24	0.25	0.29	0.46	0.57
14. Digit comp.	0.33	0.20	– 0.06	– 0.28	0.33	0.29	0.24	0.22	0.18	0.29	0.26	0.43	0.38
15. Letter comp.	0.22	0.17	0.07	– 0.21	0.25	0.18	0.22	0.19	0.21	0.24	0.18	0.41	0.29	0.60
16. Pattern comp.	0.34	0.23	0.10	– 0.18	0.42	0.36	0.33	0.31	0.07	0.16	0.39	0.30	0.36	0.48	0.40

Computed correlation used Pearson method with pairwise deletion. FlankerDL = Flanker with adaptive response deadline; StroopDL = Stroop with adaptive response deadline; VA = Visual arrays; SymSpan = Symmetry span; RotSpan = Rotation span; RunLetter = Running letter span; RunDigit = Running digit span; RAPM = Raven’s advanced progressive matrices; Comp = Comparison. Values in boldface were statistically significant at α = .05