Skip to main content
. 2023 May 30;38(11):2546–2552. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08222-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Seen in Primary Care or Endocrinology Clinics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2021, by Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) Use

Mean (SD) or % (n) Total cohort No CGM use CGM use p value
N = 30,585 n = 26,692 n = 3893
Age, years 62.5 (13.7) 63.3 (13.5) 57.5 (13.5)  < 0.001
Female gender 50.6 (15,573) 50.6% (13,501) 50.7% (1973) 0.921
Race 0.154
  White 72.3% (22,109) 72.1% (19,255) 73.3% (2854)
  Black 18.0% (5489) 17.8% (4742) 19.2% (747)
  Asian 2.3% (693) 2.3% (613) 2.1% (80)
  American Indian 0.2% (62) 0.2% (55) 0.2% (7)
  Native Hawaiian 0.1% (27) 0.1% (20) 0.2% (7)
  Multiple 0.7% (222) 0.7% (189) 0.9% (33)
  Missing 6.5% (1983) 6.8% (1818) 4.2% (165)
Hispanic ethnicity 3.1% (954) 3.2% (842) 2.9% (112) 0.167
Insurance status  < 0.001
  Government 44.4% (13,582) 46.7% (12,464) 28.7% (1118)
  Private 52.7% (16,114) 50.3% (13,437) 68.8% (2677)
  Other 2.0% (598) 1.9% (501) 2.5% (97)
2021 visit type(s)  < 0.001
  Primary care 59.6% (18,239) 65.0% (17,337) 23.2% (902)
  Endocrinology 19.7% (6015) 17.3% (4624) 35.7% (1391)
  Both 20.7% (6331) 17.7% (4731) 41.1% (1600)
Insulin type  < 0.001
  None 48.7% (14,892) 54.0% (14,413) 12.3% (479)
  Basal 6.9% (2113) 6.9% (1828) 7.3% (285)
  Prandial* 12.6% (3849) 13.2% (3526) 8.3% (323)
  Both 31.8% (9731) 25.9% (6925) 72.1% (2806)
Most recent HbA1c (%) 7.4 (1.7) 7.3 (1.7) 8.0 (1.8)  < 0.001
  HbA1c ≥ 8.5% 19.2% (5207) 17.1% (3963) 32.3% (1244)
HbA1c (%) prior to first CGM prescription NA NA 8.6 (2.0) NA
  HbA1c ≥ 8.5% NA NA 46.1% (1564)

Nonparametric tests of difference used (e.g., Wilcoxon rank sum Kruskal–Wallis test)

NA not applicable, SD standard deviation

*We were unable to differentiate those using prandial insulin with an insulin pump from those on multiple daily injections

88.5% (27,074/30,585) had a recent HbA1c value; 87.0% (23,221/26,692) no CGM use and 98.5% CGM use (3835/3893)

95.8% (3729/3893) of CGM users had a HbA1c value prior to first CGM prescription. We excluded HbA1c values more than 7 months before the first CGM prescription (n = 338), resulting in 3391/3893 CGM users with an HbA1c within 7 months of their first CGM prescription who were included in this calculation