Table 5.
Comparison of visual evoked potential parameters between cases and controls
| Visual evoked potential | Parameters | Cases (n=30) | Controls (n=10) | Total (n=40) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P100 latency right | Mean (SD) | 95 (8) | 93 (4) | 94 (7) | 0.89 |
| Median (IQR) | 93 (88-101) | 92 (90-94) | 92 (89-101) | ||
| Range | 83-116 | 87-101 | 83-116 | ||
| P100 amplitude right | Mean (SD) | 6.4 (2.4) | 5.9 (1.2) | 6.3 (2.1) | 0.233 |
| Median (IQR) | 6.7 (5.5-7.9) | 6.3 (5.3-6.8) | 6.6 (5.4-7.8) | ||
| Range | 1.4-9.8 | 3.5-7.2 | 1.4-9.8 | ||
| P100 latency left | Mean (SD) | 95 (9) | 96 (5) | 95 (8) | 0.77 |
| Median (IQR) | 94 (88-102) | 98 (93-99) | 95 (88-101) | ||
| Range | 81-116 | 86-101 | 81-116 | ||
| P100 amplitude left | Mean (SD) | 6.9 (1.9) | 6.2 (1.3) | 6.8 (1.8) | 0.331 |
| Median (IQR) | 6.9 (5.4-8.7) | 6.6 (5.4-6.9) | 6.9 (5.4-8.4) | ||
| Range | 3.5-9.7 | 3.7-7.8 | 3.5-9.7 |
IQR=interquartile range, SD=standard deviation