Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 2;71(2):369–378. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1870_22

Table 5.

Comparison of visual evoked potential parameters between cases and controls

Visual evoked potential Parameters Cases (n=30) Controls (n=10) Total (n=40) P
P100 latency right Mean (SD) 95 (8) 93 (4) 94 (7) 0.89
Median (IQR) 93 (88-101) 92 (90-94) 92 (89-101)
Range 83-116 87-101 83-116
P100 amplitude right Mean (SD) 6.4 (2.4) 5.9 (1.2) 6.3 (2.1) 0.233
Median (IQR) 6.7 (5.5-7.9) 6.3 (5.3-6.8) 6.6 (5.4-7.8)
Range 1.4-9.8 3.5-7.2 1.4-9.8
P100 latency left Mean (SD) 95 (9) 96 (5) 95 (8) 0.77
Median (IQR) 94 (88-102) 98 (93-99) 95 (88-101)
Range 81-116 86-101 81-116
P100 amplitude left Mean (SD) 6.9 (1.9) 6.2 (1.3) 6.8 (1.8) 0.331
Median (IQR) 6.9 (5.4-8.7) 6.6 (5.4-6.9) 6.9 (5.4-8.4)
Range 3.5-9.7 3.7-7.8 3.5-9.7

IQR=interquartile range, SD=standard deviation