Skip to main content
. 2023 May 16;73(731):e427–e434. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0374

Table 2.

Summary of urgent triage outcomes selected and upgrading/downgrading of primary triage outcome by clinician

By clinician Mean Median IQR Variation associated with clinician (OR)a
Digital triage dataset (n: calls = 177 786, clinicians = 259)
Calls, n 755 378 60–1144 N/A
Urgent triage outcome selected, % 52.84 55.33 37.62–70.0 54.92

Dataset containing primary triage urgency code (n: calls = 98 946, clinicians = 253)
Calls, n 1051 922 486–1382 N/A
Calls upgraded, % 11.7 10.7 8.1–14.1 5.15
Calls downgraded, % 73.6 74.5 69.0–78.8 4.71
a

OR covering 95% mid-range of clinicians. For example, clinicians with the greatest odds of selecting an urgent triage outcome, at the top of the 95% mid-range, had 55 times greater odds of selecting an urgent outcome compared with the clinicians with lowest odds to generating this, at the bottom of the 95% mid-range. IQR = interquartile range.

N/A = not applicable. OR = odds ratio.