Skip to main content
. 2023 May 26;73(731):279–282. doi: 10.3399/bjgp23X733161

Table 1.

A comparison of four of the methods for measuring continuity in general practices

UPC Bice–Boxerman SLICC OPR
Ease of calculation/understanding Easy
Calculated by dividing a patient’s appointment count with the most-seen GP by each patient’s total appointment count Mean often used as summary statistic for group of patients
More difficult
Calculated for each patient using the formula COC = ((SUM(nj2)) − n)/(n(n − 1)) from j = 1 to j = s, where n is the total number of consultations, nj is the number of consultations to GP j and s is the total number of GPs seen by the patient
Mean often used as summary statistic for group of patients
Easy
Calculated for group of patients (often a GP’s list) by dividing the group’s number of appointments with the named/list-holding GP by the total number of appointments for the group
Expressed as a percentage
Easy
Calculated for a list-holding GP by dividing appointment count with patients on their own list by the total number of appointments with that GP Expressed as a percentage
Level of measurement Patient Patient Appointments for a group of patients A single GP’s appointments
Minimum requirements Two appointments in timeframe Two appointments in timeframe, three more usual A pre-specified named GP for each patient A pre-specified named GP for each patient
Minimum timescale If the timescale is too short, <1 year, most patients excluded It then becomes a measure of frequent-attender continuity If the timescale is too short, <1 year, most patients excluded It then becomes a measure of frequent-attender continuity Can be measured monthly Can be measured monthly
Strengths Works for any GP
No requirement for named GP
Easy to calculate and understand
Patient-level measure so allows comparisons between individuals
Takes into account continuity with more than one GP
No requirement for named GP
Patient-level measure so allows comparisons between individuals
Easy to understand and calculate
Can be used in statistical process control charts
Good for monthly measurement
Includes all appointments and all patients
Patient perspective
Easy to understand and calculate
Useful for looking at continuity and workload from the GP perspective
Can be used in statistical process control charts
Good for monthly measurement Includes all appointments and all patients
Limitations Less useful for short-term measurement
Does not take into account team continuity
Bias towards frequent attenders if the timescale is too short
Upwards skew if patients with only two appointments included
Sometimes most-seen provider is a locum or registrar
Less useful for short-term measurement
Bias towards frequent attenders if the timescale is too short
Requires a named GP who has seen the patient before or will again. High turnover of patients or GPs may reduce this
Requires the ‘usual’ or named GP field to be correct and up-to-date
Does not take into account team continuity
Not patients’ perspective A GP could see only their own patients but, if the list size were too high, their patients would not see their own GP very often To be meaningful, practice needs to be using personal lists Does not take into account team continuity
Possible adaptions Could be adapted so that the ‘usual’ provider is a pre-specified named GP
Could be used to identify which GP the patient sees the most when setting up GP lists
A cumulative measure of the previous year to date could be used for regular monitoring
A cumulative measure of the previous year-to-date could be used for regular monitoring Could be adapted to measure the percentage of appointments with both/all the GPs within the micro-team Could be adapted to measure the percentage of micro-team GP appointments with patients on the lists of both/all the GPs within the micro-team

COC = Continuity of Care. OPR = Own Patient Ratio. SLICC = St Leonard’s Index of Continuity of Care. UPC = Usual Provider of Care.