Table 1.
A comparison of four of the methods for measuring continuity in general practices
| UPC | Bice–Boxerman | SLICC | OPR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of calculation/understanding | Easy Calculated by dividing a patient’s appointment count with the most-seen GP by each patient’s total appointment count Mean often used as summary statistic for group of patients |
More difficult Calculated for each patient using the formula COC = ((SUM(nj2)) − n)/(n(n − 1)) from j = 1 to j = s, where n is the total number of consultations, nj is the number of consultations to GP j and s is the total number of GPs seen by the patient Mean often used as summary statistic for group of patients |
Easy Calculated for group of patients (often a GP’s list) by dividing the group’s number of appointments with the named/list-holding GP by the total number of appointments for the group Expressed as a percentage |
Easy Calculated for a list-holding GP by dividing appointment count with patients on their own list by the total number of appointments with that GP Expressed as a percentage |
| Level of measurement | Patient | Patient | Appointments for a group of patients | A single GP’s appointments |
| Minimum requirements | Two appointments in timeframe | Two appointments in timeframe, three more usual | A pre-specified named GP for each patient | A pre-specified named GP for each patient |
| Minimum timescale | If the timescale is too short, <1 year, most patients excluded It then becomes a measure of frequent-attender continuity | If the timescale is too short, <1 year, most patients excluded It then becomes a measure of frequent-attender continuity | Can be measured monthly | Can be measured monthly |
| Strengths | Works for any GP No requirement for named GP Easy to calculate and understand Patient-level measure so allows comparisons between individuals |
Takes into account continuity with more than one GP No requirement for named GP Patient-level measure so allows comparisons between individuals |
Easy to understand and calculate Can be used in statistical process control charts Good for monthly measurement Includes all appointments and all patients Patient perspective |
Easy to understand and calculate Useful for looking at continuity and workload from the GP perspective Can be used in statistical process control charts Good for monthly measurement Includes all appointments and all patients |
| Limitations | Less useful for short-term measurement Does not take into account team continuity Bias towards frequent attenders if the timescale is too short Upwards skew if patients with only two appointments included Sometimes most-seen provider is a locum or registrar |
Less useful for short-term measurement Bias towards frequent attenders if the timescale is too short |
Requires a named GP who has seen the patient before or will again. High turnover of patients or GPs may reduce this Requires the ‘usual’ or named GP field to be correct and up-to-date Does not take into account team continuity |
Not patients’ perspective A GP could see only their own patients but, if the list size were too high, their patients would not see their own GP very often To be meaningful, practice needs to be using personal lists Does not take into account team continuity |
| Possible adaptions | Could be adapted so that the ‘usual’ provider is a pre-specified named GP Could be used to identify which GP the patient sees the most when setting up GP lists A cumulative measure of the previous year to date could be used for regular monitoring |
A cumulative measure of the previous year-to-date could be used for regular monitoring | Could be adapted to measure the percentage of appointments with both/all the GPs within the micro-team | Could be adapted to measure the percentage of micro-team GP appointments with patients on the lists of both/all the GPs within the micro-team |
COC = Continuity of Care. OPR = Own Patient Ratio. SLICC = St Leonard’s Index of Continuity of Care. UPC = Usual Provider of Care.