Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;38(6):1397–1404. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac236

Table 2:

Simplified comparison between the PRIMO and OPERA studies [7, 8].

Characteristics PRIMO (Multinational) OPERA (Chinese) Comments
n 227 (115/112) N = 60 (30/30)
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) 31 (24–43) 19.7 (16–30.6) Opera mean (IQR)
LVH Mild moderate or no LVH Moderate to severe LVH
Diagnosis MRI/echo Echo MRI (primary endpoint)
Initial dosing Mostly 2 µg paricalcitol/day Mostly 1µg paricalcitol/day (2 µg if >500 pg/ml) 48 weeks PRIMO; 52 weeks OPERA
iPTH absolute basal values (pg/ml) Paricalcitol group: 100 (66–174); placebo group: 106 (71–153) Paricalcitol group: 156 (108–235) Placebo group: 129 (121–176) Post-paricalcitol: 51 (37–78)
ΔLVMI (g/m2) Paricalcitol group 0.34 g/m2 (−0.14–0.83) versus placebo group −0.07 g/m2 (−0.55–0.42 g/m2); adjusted least squares mean (95% CI) Paricalcitol group −2.59 g/m2 (−6.13–0.32) versus placebo group −4.85 g/m2 (−9.89–1.10); median (IQR) NS
Hypercalcaemia 23% 43.3 versus 3.3% OPERA 70% on calcium-based phosphate binders
Other Lower hospitalization rate Lower hospitalization rate (no CV events in paricalcitol group) Underpowered for events (OPERA 0 versus 6)

IQR: interquartile range; LVMI: left ventricular mass index; MRI: magnetic resonance image; NSL not significant.