TABLE 2.
Author, year | Study population | Study design | Levels of independent variable | Sleep outcome | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fakhr-Movahedi et al., 2018 [40] | 68 Iranian patients with acute coronary syndrome, aged 35–85 y, M and F | Randomized, controlled, parallel arm | Experimental: Milk (150 mL)–honey (30 g) mixture, twice/d for 3 d | Sleep quality score measured using Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire at baseline and day 3 | Sleep quality increased in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes) |
Control: Patients received routine care. No beverage provided | Sleep quality at day 3 was higher in the experimental group than in the control group | ||||
Schaafsma et al., 2021 [50] | 70 Dutch healthy adults, aged 30–50 y, M and F | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover | Experimental: 19 g of dairy whey protein and GOS-based beverage enriched with Trp (see text for more detail) | Sleep quality measured using PSQI weekly | No differences in change in sleep quality observed in an intention-to-treat analysis |
Control: 12 g of taste-matched skimmed milk powder placebo beverage | Multiple sleep dimensions measured objectively over 5 d using headband tracker at baseline and end point | In modified per-protocol analysis, at day 14, sleep quality improved in the experimental compared with that in the control group | |||
Experimental and placebo beverages consumed daily for 3 wk | Objectively measured REM sleep improved in the experimental group compared with that in the control group | ||||
Özcan et al., 2019 [42] | 68 Turkish menopausal women with sleep complaints, aged 45–65 y, F only | Randomized controlled, parallel arm | Experimental: 500 mL kefir beverage daily for 1 mo | Sleep complaints measured using WHIIRS at baseline and end point (lower scores represent better sleep) | Sleep improved (decrease in WHIIRS score) in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes) |
Control: No beverage provided | End point sleep scores were lower (better sleep) in the experimental vs. control | ||||
Yamamura et al., 2009 [44] | 29 Japanese older healthy adults, aged 60–81 y, M and F | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover | Experimental: 100 g fermented milk beverage with Lactobacillus helveticus | Multiple sleep dimensions measured using wrist actigraphy over 3 wk | Sleep efficiency increased and WASO decreased in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes) |
Control: 100 g placebo milk matched for acidity | Sleep health risk measured using Sleep Health Risk Index score at end point | No between-condition differences in end point measures | |||
Experimental and control beverages consumed daily for daily for 3 wk | |||||
Kinoshita et al., 2021 [52] | 961 Japanese health care workers, aged 20–71 y, F only | Randomized, controlled, open label | Experimental: 112 mL fermented yogurt with Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1 consumed daily for 16 wk | Sleep quality measured using PSQI at baseline and end point | Sleep quality improved (PSQI score decreased) in experimental vs. control |
Control: No yogurt | |||||
Takada et al., 2017 [43] | 94 Japanese healthy students, aged 30 y or younger, M and F | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm | Experimental: 100 mL fermented milk with Lactobacillus casei | Sleep quality measured using Oguri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory | No between-group differences in changes in total sleep score |
Control: 100 mL placebo milk matched for acidity and flavor | Multiple sleep dimensions measured using single-channel EEG | Self-reported sleepiness decreased (higher scores represent less sleepiness) and sleep time increased in experimental vs. control | |||
Experimental and control beverages consumed daily for 11 wk (8 wk until stressful stimulus and 3 wk after) | Measures collected at baseline, wk 6, wk 8, wk 9, and wk 11 | N3 stage sleep and δ power was decreased in control vs. experimental | |||
Markus et al., 2005 [57] | 28 Dutch healthy students: (14 with sleep complaints, 14 without), mean age: 22 y (range not provided), M and F | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover | Experimental: Milkshake with 20 g of Trp-enriched A-LAC | Sleepiness measured using Stanford Sleepiness Scale in the evening before and morning after the meal | Trp:LNAA was higher in experimental vs. control; observed in both poor and good habitual sleepers |
Control: Energy-matched placebo milkshake with 20 g sodium caseinate | Plasma Trp:LNAA levels after the meal | Sleepiness decreased in experimental vs control; observed in both good and poor habitual sleepers | |||
Beverages consumed with standard meal on 1 night | |||||
Ong et al., 2017 [46] | 10 Australian college students, mean age: 27 y (range not provided), M only | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover | Experimental: Milkshake with 20 g of Trp-enriched A-LAC | Multiple sleep dimensions measured using wrist actigraphy | Total sleep time was significantly higher in experimental vs. control |
Control: Energy-matched placebo milkshake with 20 g sodium caseinate | Sleep efficiency was significantly higher in experimental vs. control | ||||
Beverages consumed with standard meal on 2 nights |
A-LAC, α-lactalbumin; DIS, difficulty initiating sleep; DMS, difficulty maintaining sleep; EEG, electroencephalogram; F, female; GOS, galacto-oligosaccaride; LNAA, large neutral amino acid; M, male; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; REM, rapid eye movement; Trp, tryptophan; WASO, wake after sleep onset; WHIIRS, Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale.