Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;14(2):283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.01.004

TABLE 2.

Summary of human clinical trials testing the effects of dairy products and dairy proteins on sleep quality

Author, year Study population Study design Levels of independent variable Sleep outcome Key findings
Fakhr-Movahedi et al., 2018 [40] 68 Iranian patients with acute coronary syndrome, aged 35–85 y, M and F Randomized, controlled, parallel arm Experimental: Milk (150 mL)–honey (30 g) mixture, twice/d for 3 d Sleep quality score measured using Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire at baseline and day 3 Sleep quality increased in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes)
Control: Patients received routine care. No beverage provided Sleep quality at day 3 was higher in the experimental group than in the control group
Schaafsma et al., 2021 [50] 70 Dutch healthy adults, aged 30–50 y, M and F Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover Experimental: 19 g of dairy whey protein and GOS-based beverage enriched with Trp (see text for more detail) Sleep quality measured using PSQI weekly No differences in change in sleep quality observed in an intention-to-treat analysis
Control: 12 g of taste-matched skimmed milk powder placebo beverage Multiple sleep dimensions measured objectively over 5 d using headband tracker at baseline and end point In modified per-protocol analysis, at day 14, sleep quality improved in the experimental compared with that in the control group
Experimental and placebo beverages consumed daily for 3 wk Objectively measured REM sleep improved in the experimental group compared with that in the control group
Özcan et al., 2019 [42] 68 Turkish menopausal women with sleep complaints, aged 45–65 y, F only Randomized controlled, parallel arm Experimental: 500 mL kefir beverage daily for 1 mo Sleep complaints measured using WHIIRS at baseline and end point (lower scores represent better sleep) Sleep improved (decrease in WHIIRS score) in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes)
Control: No beverage provided End point sleep scores were lower (better sleep) in the experimental vs. control
Yamamura et al., 2009 [44] 29 Japanese older healthy adults, aged 60–81 y, M and F Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover Experimental: 100 g fermented milk beverage with Lactobacillus helveticus Multiple sleep dimensions measured using wrist actigraphy over 3 wk Sleep efficiency increased and WASO decreased in the experimental condition; no change in control (no statistical comparison of these changes)
Control: 100 g placebo milk matched for acidity Sleep health risk measured using Sleep Health Risk Index score at end point No between-condition differences in end point measures
Experimental and control beverages consumed daily for daily for 3 wk
Kinoshita et al., 2021 [52] 961 Japanese health care workers, aged 20–71 y, F only Randomized, controlled, open label Experimental: 112 mL fermented yogurt with Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1 consumed daily for 16 wk Sleep quality measured using PSQI at baseline and end point Sleep quality improved (PSQI score decreased) in experimental vs. control
Control: No yogurt
Takada et al., 2017 [43] 94 Japanese healthy students, aged 30 y or younger, M and F Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel arm Experimental: 100 mL fermented milk with Lactobacillus casei Sleep quality measured using Oguri-Shirakawa-Azumi Sleep Inventory No between-group differences in changes in total sleep score
Control: 100 mL placebo milk matched for acidity and flavor Multiple sleep dimensions measured using single-channel EEG Self-reported sleepiness decreased (higher scores represent less sleepiness) and sleep time increased in experimental vs. control
Experimental and control beverages consumed daily for 11 wk (8 wk until stressful stimulus and 3 wk after) Measures collected at baseline, wk 6, wk 8, wk 9, and wk 11 N3 stage sleep and δ power was decreased in control vs. experimental
Markus et al., 2005 [57] 28 Dutch healthy students: (14 with sleep complaints, 14 without), mean age: 22 y (range not provided), M and F Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover Experimental: Milkshake with 20 g of Trp-enriched A-LAC Sleepiness measured using Stanford Sleepiness Scale in the evening before and morning after the meal Trp:LNAA was higher in experimental vs. control; observed in both poor and good habitual sleepers
Control: Energy-matched placebo milkshake with 20 g sodium caseinate Plasma Trp:LNAA levels after the meal Sleepiness decreased in experimental vs control; observed in both good and poor habitual sleepers
Beverages consumed with standard meal on 1 night
Ong et al., 2017 [46] 10 Australian college students, mean age: 27 y (range not provided), M only Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover Experimental: Milkshake with 20 g of Trp-enriched A-LAC Multiple sleep dimensions measured using wrist actigraphy Total sleep time was significantly higher in experimental vs. control
Control: Energy-matched placebo milkshake with 20 g sodium caseinate Sleep efficiency was significantly higher in experimental vs. control
Beverages consumed with standard meal on 2 nights

A-LAC, α-lactalbumin; DIS, difficulty initiating sleep; DMS, difficulty maintaining sleep; EEG, electroencephalogram; F, female; GOS, galacto-oligosaccaride; LNAA, large neutral amino acid; M, male; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; REM, rapid eye movement; Trp, tryptophan; WASO, wake after sleep onset; WHIIRS, Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale.