Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 1;14(2):295–316. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.01.006

TABLE 5.

Quality Assessment of the included studies using the Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics)

Study [reference] Study design Quality rating Validity items1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Bonnell et al. [33] Cross-sectional Neutral × ×
Bouillon-Minois et al. [59] Observational Neutral UC NA
Chen et al. [37] Observational Neutral UC × NA UC UC UC
Esquirol et al. [60] Cross-sectional Positive UC × UC UC
Farias et al. [53] Cross-sectional Neutral UC ×
Flanagan et al. [61] Cross-sectional Neutral UC UC UC UC
Fradkin et al. [70] Cross-sectional Neutral × × × NA × ×
Han et al. [54] Cross-sectional Neutral UC UC UC UC
Heath et al. [46] Cross-sectional Neutral × ×
Hulsegge et al. [34] Cross-sectional Neutral UC NA × UC
Kosmadopoulos et al. [35] Observational Neutral NA × UC
Lennernas et al. [47] Cross-sectional Neutral UC × UC
Lennernas et al. [62] Cross-sectional Neutral UC UC UC
Lennernas et al. [18] Cross-sectional Neutral UC NA NA UC
Manodpitipong et al. [55] Cross-sectional Neutral × UC UC UC
Mansouri et al. [56] Observational Neutral NA UC
Morikawa et al. [49] Cross-sectional Neutral NA UC UC
Mortaş et al. [36] Observational Neutral × UC NA
Peplonska et al. [63] Cross-sectional Neutral × UC UC UC
Reinberg et al. [67] Observational Neutral × UC NA UC UC UC
Romon et al. [64] Cross-sectional Positive NA UC UC
Sathyanarayana and Gangadharaiah [57] Cross-sectional Neutral × × UC NA × UC ×
Seibt et al. [65] Cross-sectional Neutral × × × UC
Seychell and Reeves [66] Cross-sectional Positive ×
Sudo and Ohtsuka [48] Cross-sectional Positive NA UC
Tada et al. [50] Cross-sectional Neutral UC × ×
Ulusoy et al. [68] Cross-sectional Neutral UC NA UC
Varli and Bilici [69] Cross-sectional Neutral UC UC NA × UC UC UC
Wirth et al. [38] Cross-sectional Neutral × NA NA × UC
Yoshizaki et al. [58] Cross-sectional Neutral × NA UC NA UC UC
Yoshizaki et al. [51] Cross-sectional Neutral × × NA ×

NA, not applicable; UC, unclear; ×, criteria has not been satisfied: ✓, criteria has been satisfied.

1

Validity items: 1) clarity of research question; 2) nil selection bias of study participants; 3) comparability of study groups; 4) description of withdrawals; 5) utilization of blinding; 6) detailed description of intervention/exposure factor; 7) validity/reliability of outcome measures; 8) appropriate statistical methods; 9) consideration of limitations/bias in the reported result; and 10) declaration of funding, sponsorship, and nil conflict of interest. Highlighted columns indicate the validity items required for a positive quality rating.