TABLE 5.
Quality Assessment of the included studies using the Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics)
| Study [reference] | Study design | Quality rating | Validity items1 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Bonnell et al. [33] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bouillon-Minois et al. [59] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | UC | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chen et al. [37] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | UC | × | ✓ | NA | UC | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Esquirol et al. [60] | Cross-sectional | Positive | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC | UC |
| Farias et al. [53] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Flanagan et al. [61] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | ✓ | UC | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fradkin et al. [70] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | × | NA | ✓ | × | ✓ | × |
| Han et al. [54] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | UC | ✓ | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Heath et al. [46] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hulsegge et al. [34] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | UC | NA | × | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kosmadopoulos et al. [35] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | × | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Lennernas et al. [47] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Lennernas et al. [62] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Lennernas et al. [18] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | ✓ | NA | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Manodpitipong et al. [55] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | × | UC | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mansouri et al. [56] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Morikawa et al. [49] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Mortaş et al. [36] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | × | ✓ | UC | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Peplonska et al. [63] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Reinberg et al. [67] | Observational | Neutral | ✓ | × | UC | NA | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC | UC |
| Romon et al. [64] | Cross-sectional | Positive | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC | UC |
| Sathyanarayana and Gangadharaiah [57] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | × | × | UC | NA | ✓ | × | UC | × | ✓ |
| Seibt et al. [65] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | × | × | × | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Seychell and Reeves [66] | Cross-sectional | Positive | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sudo and Ohtsuka [48] | Cross-sectional | Positive | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC |
| Tada et al. [50] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | UC | × | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ulusoy et al. [68] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | ✓ | ✓ | NA | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Varli and Bilici [69] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | UC | UC | NA | × | UC | ✓ | ✓ | UC | UC |
| Wirth et al. [38] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | ✓ | × | NA | NA | × | UC | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yoshizaki et al. [58] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | × | ✓ | NA | UC | NA | UC | UC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yoshizaki et al. [51] | Cross-sectional | Neutral | ✓ | × | × | NA | × | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
NA, not applicable; UC, unclear; ×, criteria has not been satisfied: ✓, criteria has been satisfied.
Validity items: 1) clarity of research question; 2) nil selection bias of study participants; 3) comparability of study groups; 4) description of withdrawals; 5) utilization of blinding; 6) detailed description of intervention/exposure factor; 7) validity/reliability of outcome measures; 8) appropriate statistical methods; 9) consideration of limitations/bias in the reported result; and 10) declaration of funding, sponsorship, and nil conflict of interest. Highlighted columns indicate the validity items required for a positive quality rating.