Table 4.
Study author, year | n | Comparison diet 1 | Comparison diet 2 | Alpha diversity | Beta diversity | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | Species | Other/notes | Significant effects on gut microbiota? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
van Faassen et al. 1987 [85] | 12 | Post-omnivorous | Post-vegan | — | — | — | Clostridia:↔ | — | Enterobacteriaceae:↔ | Anaerobes:Bifidobacteria (count):↔Bacteroides (count):↔Aerobes:Enterococci (count):↔Lactobacilli (count):↑ | — | Mean counts of bacteria:Total anaerobes:↔Total aerobes:↔ | Yes |
12 | Post-omnivorous | Post-vegetarian | — | — | — | Clostridia:↔ | — | Enterobacteriaceae:↔ | Anaerobes:Bifidobacteria (count):↔Bacteroides (count):↔Aerobes:Enterococci (count):↔Lactobacilli (count):↔ | — | Mean counts of bacteria:Total anaerobes:↔Total aerobes:↔ | No | |
12 | Post-vegetarian | Post-vegan | — | — | — | Clostridia:↔ | — | Enterobacteriaceae:↔ | Anaerobes:Bifidobacteria (count):↔Bacteroides (count):↔Aerobes:Enterococci (count):↑Lactobacilli (count):↑ | — | Mean counts of bacteria:Total anaerobes:↔Total aerobes:↔ | Yes | |
Windey 2012 et al. [73] | 20 | Higher meat | Lower meat | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Among 64 bandclasses, no difference was detected in the allocation of bandclass between diets. | No |
Foerster et al. 2014 [86] | 20 | Post-red meat | Pre-red meat | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Clostridium sp.: ↓ | Band appearance of bacteria:↔ band diversity (total number of bands)↑ 5 bands appearance↓ 3 bands appearance | Yes |
20 | Post-whole grain | Pre-whole grain | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | Collinsella aerofaciens: ↑ | Band appearance of bacteria:↑ band diversity (total number of bands)↑ 5 bands appearance↓ 3 bands appearance | ||
Lang et al. 2018 [87] | 109 | By protein sources (1) Red meat(2) White meat (3) Non-meat | By amounts of saturated fat(1) High saturated fat(2) Low saturated fat | Shannon diversity index:↔ among protein sources or between high vs low amounts of saturated fat | ↔unweighted UniFrac distance: no clustering by diet | F/B ratio (log2):↔ by diet or saturated fat | NR | NR | NR | 2 reported genera (Coprococcus and Ruminococcus) differed by protein sources, but pairwise comparisons between protein sources were not reported.57 genera differed by saturated fat amounts. | — | 19 OTUs responded to protein source at both high and low saturated fat amounts (protein-sensitive, but not specific to protein sources). Differentially abundant OTUs: [high and low amounts of saturated fat combined] 3 between red meat vs non-meat, 1 between white meat vs non-meat, 0 between red meat vs white meat; [low saturated fat] 115, 125, 130 OTUs, respectively; [high saturated fat] 203, 198, 240 OTUs, respectively. | Yes |
Hess et al. 2018 [84] | 32 | Post-Red meat (5d average) | Post-Mushroom (5d average) | — | — | Bacteroidetes:↓Firmicutes:↑ | NR | NR | NR | Bacteroides:↓Parabacteroides:↓Coprococcus:↓Anaerostipes:↓Sutterella:↓Dorea:↑02d06:↑ | — | Taxa (phylum and genus) with at least 0.05% relative abundance were reported. Relative abundances were log-transformed and controlled for false discovery rate with p<0.004. | Yes |
Schmedes et al. 2018 [71] | 19 | Post-lean seafood | Pre-lean seafood | — | — | Firmicutes:↔Bacteroidetes:↔F/B ratio:↔ | — | — | — | Clostridium cluster IV:↔ | — | The following results were described and not reported in details: the dataset included "42 bacterial OTU groups at the genera level, 8 bacterial OTU groups at the family level, 2 bacterial OTU groups at the order level, 1 bacterial OTU group at the class level, and 1 bacterial OTU group at the domain level”. | Yes |
19 | Post-non-seafood | Pre-non-seafood | — | — | Firmicutes:↔(p=0.1)Bacteroidetes:↔(p=0.1)F/B ratio:↔(p=0.1) | NR | NR | NR | Clostridium cluster IV:↓ (greater reduction than lean-seafood group) | — | |||
Pagliai et al. 2020 [74] | 23 | Post-Mediterranean diet | Pre-Mediterranean diet | Richness; inverse Simpson’s, Gini-Simpson’s, Shannon’s indices; evenness, dominance:Phylum-level:↔Class-level:↔Order-level:↔Family-level:↔Genus-level:↔ | (1) Weighted Unifrac (PCoA)(2) Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metrics(3) Principle component analysis (PCA) & co-inertia analysis (CIA):No clearly separated clustering by diet.LEfSe tool: no discriminating characteristics by diet.PERMANOVA: no difference in microbiota composition by diet at any taxonomic level. | F/B ratio:↔F/P ratio:↔Other phyla:↔ | Betaproteobacteria:↓ (p=0.05) | Burkholderiales:↓ (p=0.05) | Alcaligenaceae:↓ (p=0.05) | Enterorhabdus:↑Lachnoclostridium:↑Parabacteroides:↓Parasutterella:↓ (p=0.05) | — | — | Yes |
23 | Post-vegetarian diet | Pre-vegetarian diet | Richness; inverse Simpson’s, Gini-Simpson’s, Shannon’s indices; evenness, dominance:Phylum-level:↔Class-level:↔Order-level:↔Family-level:↔Genus-level:↔ | F/B ratio:↔F/P ratio:↔Euryarchaeota:↑ (abundance median increased from 0 to 1)Other phyla:↔ | Methanobacteria:↑ (abundance median increased from 0 to 1) | Methanobacteriales:↑ (abundance median increased from 0 to 1) | Clostridiaceae_1:↓Methanobacteriaceae:↑ (abundance median increased from 0 to 1) | Anaerostipes:↑Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1:↓Methanobrevibacter:↑ (abundance median increased from 0 to 1)Odoribacter:↓Streptococcus:↑Tyzzerella_3: abundance median=0, interquartile range ↑ | — | — | |||
23 | Pre-Post change of Mediterranean diet | Pre-Post change of vegetarian diet | Order-level richness: median=1, interquartile range↑Genus-level richness:↓All other parameters:↔ | F/B ratio:↔F/P ratio:↔Other phyla:↔ | — | — | Clostridiaceae_1:↑ | Anaerostipes:↓Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1:↑Enterorhabdus:↑Slackia: abundance median=0, interquartile range ↑Veillonella:↑ | — | — | |||
Crimarco et al. 2020 [88] | 36 | Animal diet | Plant diet | — | Bray-Curtis dissimilarity:↔ | NR | NR | NR | NR | Volcano plot of taxa with between-group difference in abundance:Lachnospiraceae sp: mixedRuminococcus sp.:↑Roseburia sp.:↑Ruminococcaceae sp.:↓ | Volcano plot of taxa with between-group difference in abundance:H. parainfluenzae:↓ | — | Yes |
36 | Post-animal | Pre-animal | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
36 | Post-plant | Pre-plant | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||
Kahleova et al. 2020 [89] | 84 | Post-omnivorous | Pre-omnivorous | Abundance-weighted phylogenetic diversity measure:↑ | — | ↔ | — | — | — | Methanobrevibacter (read counts and %):↑Eubacterium (read counts):↑ | Bacteroides fragilis (read counts and %):↓ | — | Yes |
84 | Post-vegan | Pre-vegan | Abundance-weighted phylogenetic diversity measure: ↔ | — | Bacteroidetes (read counts):↑Proteobacteria (%):↓ | — | — | — | Bifidobacterium (read counts):↑Anaerostipes (read counts):↑ | Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (read counts&%):↑Bacteroides fragilis (read counts and %):↓ | — | ||
168 | Post-pre change in omnivorous | Post-pre change in vegan | Abundance-weighted phylogenetic diversity measure:↑ | — | ↔ | — | — | — | ↔ | Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (%):↓Bacteroides fragilis (read counts and %):↑ | — | ||
Meslier et al. 2020 [92] | 62 | Post-Mediterranean diet (wk4) | Post-omnivorous diet (wk4) | — | Separate diversity (N-integrative supervised analysis)Dissimilarity by adherence to MedD diet 0-4wk | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | 77 species differed at week 4, primarily:↓ species:Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans, Flavonifractor plautii, Parabacteroides merdae, Ruminococcus torques, Ruminococcus Gnavus, Streptococcus thermophilusi, Streptococcus thermophilus↑ species: 5 members of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and 7 members of taxa Roseburia and Lachnospiraceae |
— | Yes |
62 | Post-Mediterranean diet (wk8) | Post-omnivorous diet (wk8) | — | 44 species differed at week 8. Information on detailed species was not extracted. | — | ||||||||
32 | Post-omnivorous diet (wk4/wk8) | Pre-omnivorous diet | — | 14 species differed at week 4 compared to baseline, 19 differed at week 8 compared to week 4. Information on detailed species was not extracted. | — | ||||||||
30 | Post- Mediterranean diet (wk4/wk8) | Pre- Mediterranean diet | — | 69 species differed at week 4 compared to baseline, 17 differed at week 8 compared to week 4. Information on detailed species was not extracted. | — | ||||||||
Kohnert et al. 2021 [91] | 53 | Post-pre change in omnivorous | Post-pre change in vegan | NR | Bray-Curtis dissimilarity: no clustering. | NR | NR | NR | NR | ↑ generaBacteroides, Clostridium, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia↓ genera:Bacteroides, Blautia, Dialister, Faecalibacterium, Ruminococcus | Differences in species were observed at ASV level.Information on detailed species was not extracted. | Unweighted UniFrac distances showed two separate clusters, but not clearly between two diets. | Yes |
27 | Post-omnivorous | Pre-omnivorous | Chao1, Shannon, Inverse Simpson, Fisher’s index:↔ | Bray-Curtis dissimilarity: no clustering | NR | NR | NR | NR | ↑ genera:Alistipes, Bacteroides, Blautia, Clostridium, Faecalibacterium (unspecified species), Megamonas, Roseburia, Ruminococcus↓ genera:Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Blautia, Dialister, Faecalibacterium, Gemminger, Phascolarctobacterium, Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Sutterella | Yes | |||
26 | Post-vegan | Pre-vegan | Chao1, Shannon, Inverse Simpson, Fisher’s index:↔ | Bray-Curtis dissimilarity: no clustering | NR | NR | NR | NR | ↑ genera:Alistipes, Bacteroides, Blautia, Coprococcus, Dialister, Dorea, Faecalibacterium (unspecified species), Phascolarctobacterium, Ruminococcus↓ genera:Akkermansia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Coprococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Ruminococcus | Yes | |||
McKenna et al. 2021 [90] | 28 | wk1-higher red meat (high) | Pre-high | Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and Shannon: ↔ |
Unweighted UniFrac: significant between-group differenceWeighted UniFrac:↔DEICODE metrics:↔ | NR | NR | Betaproteobacteriales:↑ | — | ↓ genera:Akkermansia, unclassified genus of family Eggerthellaceae, Ruminococcaceae UCG-010, Megasphaera, Veillonella↑ genera:Catenibacterium | — | — | Yes |
28 | Post-high | wk1-high | — | — | ↓ genera:Catenibacterium↑ genera:Akkermansia, unclassified genus of family Eggerthellaceae, Veillonella | — | — | ||||||
28 | Post-high | Pre-high | Betaproteobacteriales:↑ | — | Megasphaera:↓ | — | — | ||||||
22 | wk1-Lower red meat (MOD) | Pre-MOD | Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and Shannon: ↔ |
Unweighted UniFrac: significant between-group differenceWeighted UniFrac:↔DEICODE metrics:↔ | NR | NR | Mollicutes RF39:↓ | Lachnospiraceae:↑ | ↓ genera:Streptococcus↑ genera:Coprococcus 2, Holdemanella, Acidaminococcus | — | — | ||
22 | Post-MOD | wk1-MOD | Mollicutes RF39:↑ | — | ↓ genera:Acidaminococcus, Holdemanella, Catenibacterium↑ genera:Veillonella | — | — | ||||||
22 | Post-MOD | Pre-MOD | — | Lachnospiraceae:↑ | ↓ genera:Blautia, Catenibacterium↑ genera:Coprococcus 2 | — | — | ||||||
50 | Post-MOD | Post-high | Faith’s phylogenetic diversity and Shannon: ↔ |
Unweighted UniFrac: significant between-group differenceWeighted UniFrac:↔DEICODE metrics:↔ | NR | NR | — | Ruminococcaceae:↓ | ↓ genera:HoldemanellaI, Acidaminococcus↑ genera:Megasphaera, metagenome | — | — | ||
50 | wk1-MOD | wk1-high | Mollicutes RF39:↓ | — | ↑ genera:Ruminiclostridium 5, Oscillibacter, Megasphaera, metagenome, Lactobacillus, Veillonella, uncultured genus of family Eggerthellaceae | — | — | ||||||
50 | Pre-MOD | Pre-high | Betaproteobacteriales:↑ | Enterobacteriaceae:↑ | ↓ genera:[Eubacterium] eligens group, Ruminococcaceae UCG-013, Coprococcus 2, Holdemanella, Acidaminococcus, Slackia, uncultured genus of family Eggerthellaceae↑ genera:Streptococcus, Catenibacterium, metagenome, Dielma | — | — | ||||||
Bratlie et al. 2021 [93] | 9 | Post-cod | Pre-cod | — | No clear separation between diets pre-intervention.Trend of separation between diets post-intervention, especially between post-salmon and post-control. | NR | NR | Post-Cod & Post-Salmon compared to Post-Control (bacterial counts):Bacteroidales:↓Clostridiales:↓Selenomonadales:↓ | NR | NR | NR | — | Yes |
13 | Post-salmon | Pre-salmon | |||||||||||
11 | Post-control | Pre-control |
Higher abundance (↑), lower abundance (↓), or comparable abundances (↔). NR, data measured but not reported; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; ASV, amplicon sequence variant.