Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 19;19(6):695–702. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01232-y

Extended Data Fig. 8. Siroheme conformation within Fsr.

Extended Data Fig. 8

a, Electrostatic charge profile of MtFsr shown in surface is coloured in red and blue to represent acidic and basic patches, respectively. The siroheme is accessible via a positively charged solvent channel. Carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur and iron are coloured in green, red, blue, yellow and orange, respectively. b and c, Close up of the axial ligands bound on the siroheme of MjFsr (b) and MtFsr (c). The 2Fo-Fc map of the siroheme and SO32− are contoured to 1.5-σ in MjFsr, while the siroheme and HS is contoured to 3-σ in MtFsr. In MjFsr the Fe-siroheme is equidistant (2.3 Å) to the sulfur from the modelled SO32− and the bridging-sulfur of the cysteine 472, suggesting a tight covalent binding. In MtFsr, the bridging-sulfur of the cysteine 472 is at a distance of 2.6 Å to the Fe-siroheme and the sulfur from the modelled HS is 2.9 Å distant to the Fe-siroheme, indicating a loose binding of the HS, which might result from a reduction event by X-ray radiation60. d, Siroheme superposition between aSirs (1AOP, 5H92), dSirs (3MM5, 2V4J) and Fsrs. Siroheme from aSirs and Fsr are coloured in green, structural siroheme/sirohydrochlorin from dSirs in black and dSirs functional sirohemes in blue. Superposition analysis shows that the functional sirohemes are arranged in a highly similar manner, whereas the conformation of the structural siroheme or sirohydrochlorin differ, which highlights the strong influence of the protein environment on the siroheme geometry.