Table 2.
Scoring and findings of oedema, ecchymosis, and other complications in the studies included
| Author | Days recorded | How oedema was recorded | Oedema results | How ecchymosis was recorded | Ecchymosis results | Other findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taşkın et al. [19] | Day 2 and 7 | Scale of 0–4 |
No significant difference between the groups on both days. Significantly higher oedema on day 2 compared to day 7 in both groups (p < 0.05) |
Scale of 0–4 |
No significant difference between the groups on both days. Significantly higher ecchymosis on day 2 compared to day 7 in both groups (p < 0.05) |
N/A |
| Ghavimi et al. [20] | Day 3 and 7 | Scale of 0–4 | Higher oedema in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after 3 and 7 days (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049). | Scale of 0–3 | Higher ecchymosis in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after 3, but not after 7 days (p > 0.117). | N/A |
| Koçak et al [21] | Day 2, 4 and 7 | Scale of 0–4 |
Higher oedema in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after day 2 (p = 0.006), no significant difference on day 4 and 7. Conventional osteotomy group oedema decreased from day 2 to 7 (p < 0.001) Piezosurgery group oedema increased from day 2 to 4 (p = 0.007) but decreased day 4 to 7 (p < 0.001) |
Scale of 0–4 |
Higher ecchymosis in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after day 2 and 4 (p < 0.001) and day 7 (p = 0.011). Significant decrease in ecchymosis for both groups from day 2 to 7 (p < 0.001 for both) |
Conventional osteotomies took less time than piezosurgery (p < 0.001); however, the overall surgery duration was not significantly different. Pain on day 2 was significantly less in piezosurgery patients (p = 0.03). Mucosal injury was significantly less common in piezosurgery patients (p = 0.001). |
| Fallahi et al. [22] | Day 2 and 7 | Scale of 0–4 | Higher oedema in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after day 2 (p = 0.043), no significant difference on day 7 (p = 0.28) | Scale of 0–3 | Higher ecchymosis conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery after 2 and 7 (p < 0.05). |
VAS scoring showed reduced post-operative pain at every time point in the piezosurgery group (p < 0.01). Significant difference between age and post-operative pain (p = 0.011), after controlling for age and gender a significant difference in post-operative pain was still shown (p = 0.002). |
| Aydoğdu et al. [23] | Day 1 and 7 | Scale of 0–4 | Higher oedema in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery on day 1 and 7 (all values p < 0.001) | Scale of 0–4 | Higher ecchymosis in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery on day 1 and 7 (all values p < 0.001) | SNOT-22, PNIF, and CCCRC did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. |
| Koc et al. [24] | Day 1 and 7 | Scale of 0–3 | Higher oedema in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery on day 1 (p < 0.001) and 7 (p = 0.005). | Scale of 0–3 | Higher ecchymosis in conventional osteotomy than piezosurgery on day 1 and 7 (p < 0.001 for both). |
Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the piezosurgery group (p = 0.002). Piezosurgery patients experienced less pain (VAS scoring) on the first day (p < 0.001) and were more satisfied with their results on the 1st and 7th day. |
| Tirelli et al. [25] | Daily for 4 days | Scale of 0–2 | Higher conventional osteotomy group than piezosurgery in the 4 day follow up period (10 vs. 2, p < 0.05) | Scale of 0–2 | Higher conventional osteotomy group than piezosurgery in the 4 day follow up period (10 vs. 2, p < 0.05) |
Most piezosurgery patients had minimal discomfort (VAS < 3); however, 75% of the conventional osteotomy group needed analgesic (p < 0.05). More mucosal injury in conventional osteotomy vs piezosurgery (5 vs. 0, p < 0.05). Similar duration of osteotomy time (p = 0.11). |
| Ilhan et al. [26] |
Day 3 and 7 Assessed by two examiners |
Scale of 0-3 |
Higher in conventional osteotomy group than piezosurgery on day 3 (p = 0.002 and 0.007) and day 7 (p = 0.001, second examiner did not agree, p = 0.061). The extent of improvement was deemed similar by one examiner (p > 0.5), and the second examiner indicated a greater improvement in the conventional osteotomy group than the piezosurgery group (p = 0.017). |
Scale of 0-3 |
Higher in conventional osteotomy group than piezosurgery on day 3 (p = 0.001 for both examiners), and on day 7 (p = 0.001 and 0.01). Extent of the improvement in both groups was similar. |
N/A |