Skip to main content
. 2023 May 17;14:1156323. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1156323

Table 3.

Antifungal activity of an 8-day-old endophytic CEL3 against selected fungal pathogens.

Fungal pathogens Inhibition (%) after 120 h of treatment IC50 of artificial atmosphere after 120 h of treatment (µl 50 ml−1) IC50 as µl ml−1 of air space needed for 50% inhibition
Rhizoctonia solani 51.5 ± 2a 18.9 ± 1a1 0.378
Alternaria alternata No inhibition 65.7 ± 2.4b1 1.314
Fusarium oxysporum 12.2 ± 1.5b 34.8 ± 1.2c1 0.696
Geotrichum candidum 40.4 ± 2.8c 27.6 ± 0.8d1 0.552
Botrytis cinerea 55.8 ± 1.6a 17.0 ± 0.3a1 0.34
Cercospora beticola 42.6 ± 2.4c 24.5 ± 0.4d1 0.49
Aspergillus fumigatus No inhibition No inhibition
Ceratocystis ulmi 35.5 ± 1.6d 31.6 ± 1.8c1 0.632
Pythium ultimum 61.9 ± 2.8e 14.7 ± 1.5a1 0.294
Monilinia fructicola 78.5 ± 4.2f 09.8 ± 0.8e1 0.18

The values on the tables are the means ± standard error (SE) of three replicates. A one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison tests) was performed to check the potential statistical differences (P <0.05) between the antifungal activity of the VOCs of endophytes against different pathogens (a–f). Also, the IC50 values of the artificial atmosphere were checked through the same technique (a1–e1). Similar letters indicate no statistical difference between the data set, and a different letter indicates a valid statistical difference between the data sets.