Table 1.
Spironolactone did not affect (A) chow or (B) water intake in mice.
| Vehicle-treated | Spironolactone-treated | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | Males | Females | ||||||
| A | Total chow** intake (g) | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM |
| 6 h | 0.95 | 0.172 | 1.28 | 0.235 | 0.43 | 0.197 | 1.22 | 0.397 | |
| 24 h#### | 2.51 | 0.343 | 4.00† | 0.259 | 2.11 | 0.404 | 4.00† | 0.886 | |
| B | Total water* intake (mL) | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM |
| 6 h | 0.80 | 0.096 | 1.06 | 0.225 | 0.80 | 0.177 | 0.98 | 0.328 | |
| 24 h#### | 1.69 | 0.164 | 3.16†† | 0.293 | 1.68 | 0.263 | 2.54 | 0.572 | |
Male: n = 8; female: n = 5.
p < 0.05
p < 0.01, male vs. female (overall sex effect; three-way ANOVA).
p < 0.0001, 6 h vs. 24 h (overall time effect; three-way ANOVA).
p < 0.05, male vehicle-treated 24 h vs. female vehicle-treated 24 h and male spironolactone-treated 24 h vs. female-spironolactone treated 24 h
p < 0.01, male vehicle-treated 24 h vs. female vehicle-treated 24 h (sex vs. time interaction; three-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak post hoc test).