Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 4;5(3):fcad106. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad106

Table 8.

Correlations between corresponding BFM and UPDRS measures

BFM measure UPDRS measure Correlation
BFM movement: right leg UPDRS 3.7: toe tapping—right foot 0.43 ± 0.16
 ” UPDRS 3.8: leg agility—right leg 0.34 ± 0.17
 ” UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—RLE 0.13 ± 0.19
BFM movement: left leg UPDRS 3.7: toe tapping—left foot 0.45 ± 0.15
 ” UPDRS 3.8: leg agility—left leg 0.35 ± 0.18
 ” UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—LLE 0.10 ± 0.19
BFM movement: right arm UPDRS 3.4: finger tapping—right hand 0.38 ± 0.17
 ” UPDRS 3.5: hand movements—right hand 0.32 ± 0.19
 ” UPDRS 3.6: pronation-supination—right hand 0.33 ± 0.19
 ” UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—RUE 0.07 ± 0.19
 ” UPDRS 3.17: rest tremor amplitude—RUE 0.08 ± 0.21
BFM movement: left arm UPDRS 3.4: Finger tapping—left hand 0.36 ± 0.18
 ” UPDRS 3.5: hand movements—left hand 0.35 ± 0.18
 ” UPDRS 3.6: pronation-supination—left hand 0.36 ± 0.18
 ” UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—LUE 0.10 ± 0.19
 ” UPDRS 3.17: rest tremor amplitude—LUE −0.25 ± 0.26

UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—RLE, UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—LLE, UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—RUE, UPDRS 3.17: rest tremor amplitude—RUE, UPDRS 3.3: rigidity—LUE and UPDRS 3.17: rest tremor amplitude—LUE lack significance as the 95% interval includes zero.