Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023 Jan 27;24(3):153–172. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00670-w

Table 2 ∣.

Cognitive constructs tested with performance-monitoring tasks in humans and macaques

Cognitive construct Performance-monitoring task
Stop-signal
taska
Change-signal
task
Go–no-go
task
Anti-saccade
task
Simon task Stroop task Flanker task MSIT
Goal maintenanceb 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Response inhibitionb 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stimulus selectionb, spatial and feature-based attention 0 1c 0 0 2d 2d 2c 2c
Response selectionb,e 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 2
Performance monitoringb 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Timekeeping 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
Stimulus–response incompatibilityf 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2
Post-error adjustmentsg 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

Rating scale: 0, not required to perform the task; 1, required but task not designed to test the cognitive construct indicated; 2, required because task designed to test the cognitive construct indicated. MSIT, multisource interference task.

a

An alternative and equivalent name for the stop-signal task is the ‘countermanding task’.

b

Construct that is part of the Research Domain Criteria framework of the US National Institute of Mental Health.

c

Relates to spatial attention.

d

Relates to feature-based attention.

e

Applies only to tasks in which multiple different actions are possible and also referred to as ‘response conflict’.

f

In some tasks, whether there is a stimulus–response conflict depends on the instructions (for example, word reading versus reporting ink colour in the Stroop task).

g

Restricted to the next trial (not within-trial correction).