Skip to main content
. 2023 May 24;2023:1399917. doi: 10.1155/2023/1399917

Table 3.

The effects of PRP&PIH on oxidative stress parameters in vitro condition.

Time Once after isolation 24 h after isolation
Groups/parameters MDA (mM) SOD (U/ml) CAT (U/ml) MDA (mM) SOD (U/ml) CAT (U/ml)
Control-Islet 0.26 ± 0.04 0.72 ± 0.33 0.91 ± 0.12 0.27 ± 0.05 0.574 ± 0.06 0.8 ± 0.14
PRP-Islet 0.253 ± 0.04 0.84 ± 0.28 0.89 ± 0.09 0.103 ± 0.02
a1d1
2.15 ± 0.34
a2d2
1.3 ± 0.12
a1d2
PIH-Islet 0.261 ± 0.05 0.8 ± 0.42 0.9 ± 0.14 0.134 ± 0.02
a1d1
1.6 ± 0.1
a2d1
1.1 ± 0.12
a1d1
PRP&PIH-Islet 0.265 ± 0.04 0.9 ± 0.37 0.91 ± 0.15 0.101 ± 0.02
a1d1
2.82 ± 0.41
a3b1c2d3
1.9 ± 0.23
a2b1c1d3

Data are presented as mean ± SEM from 8 batches of ten islets from 6 rats. aStatistically significant differences compared to control in the same time. bStatistically significant differences compared to the PRP-Islet group in the same time. cStatistically significant differences compared to the PIH-Islet group in the time. dStatistically significant differences compared to the same group and different time. 1p < 0.05, 2p < 0.01, and 3p < 0.001. Control-Islet: untreated islet; PRP-Islet: islet treated with PRP; PIH-Islet: islet treated with PIH; PRP&PIH-Islet: islet treated with PRP&PIH.