Table 6. Comparison of the Methods and Conclusion of the Present Study with the Existing Literature.
Study | Method | Use of ultrasonography | Year | Conclusion | Follow-up duration |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peerbooms et al.13) | Double-blinded | No | 2010 | PRP in chronic LET more significantly reduced pain and increased function than corticosteroid injection. | 1 yr |
Gosens et al.7) | Double-blinded | No | 2011 | The effects of PRP in improving function exceeded the effects of steroids, even after a follow-up of 2 years. | 2 yr |
Gautam et al.8) | Yes | 2015 | PRP healed the lesion biologically, while corticosteroids provided short-term relief at the cost of tendon degeneration. | 6 mo | |
This study | Triple-blinded | Yes | 2022 | While corticosteroids were superior in the short term, PRP provided sustained relief in the long term and also played a part in biological healing. | 2 yr |
PRP: platelet-rich plasma, LET: lateral elbow tendinopathy.