Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;6:581. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04952-6

Table 2.

Classification performance between clinical subgroups in individual-specific/atlas-based functional connectivity.

SVM Classification AUC ACC SEN SPE
APOE ε4 carriers (N = 120) Individual-specific FC NA vs. MCI 0.94 0.88 0.92 0.85
MCI vs. AD 0.92 0.87 0.73 0.94
NA vs. AD 0.94 0.90 0.92 0.85
Atlas-based FC NA vs. MCI 0.90 0.82 0.94 0.65
MCI vs. AD 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.80
NA vs. AD 0.92 0.88 0.90 0.80
APOE ε4 noncarriers (N = 115) Individual-specific FC NA vs. MCI 0.92 0.84 0.98 0.64
MCI vs. AD 0.89 0.81 0.50 1.00
NA vs. AD 0.96 0.89 0.94 0.82
Atlas-based FC NA vs. MCI 0.90 0.83 0.96 0.64
MCI vs. AD 0.89 0.81 0.50 1.00
NA vs. AD 0.96 0.87 0.94 0.78

Individual-specific FC Individual-specific functional connectivity, Atlas-based FC Atlas-based functional connectivity.