Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;13:8847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34012-2

Table 5.

Regression coefficients demonstrating the associations between tau deposition on [18F]-flortaucipir PET and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios.

Regression coefficient [95% CI] p-value
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio
Regional tau PET SUVR in meta-temporal regions  − 0.060 [− 0.23, 0.11] 0.50
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 1 regions  − 0.042 [− 0.23, 0.15] 0.66
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 3 and 4 regions  − 0.040 [− 0.16, 0.085] 0.53
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 5 and 6 regions  − 0.022 [− 0.10, 0.055] 0.57
Regional tau PET SUVP in the medial temporal regions  − 0.015 [− 0.100, 0.071] 0.73
Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte ratio
Regional tau PET SUVR in meta-temporal regions  − 0.018 [− 0.15, 0.12] 0.80
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 1 regions  − 0.049 [− 0.20, 0.097] 0.51
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 3 and 4 regions  − 0.014 [− 0.11, 0.083] 0.77
Regional tau PET SUVR in Braak 5 and 6 regions  − 0.027 [− 0.087, 0.034] 0.38
Regional tau PET SUVP in the medial temporal regions  − 0.0030 [− 0.065, 0.059] 0.92

SUVR standardized uptake value ratio.

SUVP standardized uptake value peak alignment.

Values shown are regression coefficients [95% CI] (p-values). Regression models included age, sex, years of education, cognitive status, and APOE genotype as covariates.