Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7343.942

Table 3.

Logistic regression for type of birth in ethnographic sample of 80 women in Pelotas, 1993. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) unless stated otherwise

Adjusted level
Characteristic* Crude 1 1-2 1, 2, and 4
Level 1
 Maternal schooling 1.22 (1.05 to 1.42; P=0.01) 1.19 (1.00 to 1.42; P=0.05) 1.11 (0.9 to 1.3; P=0.25) 1.00 (0.9 to 1.3; P=0.6)
Family income (n=77) 1.29 (1.05 to 1.60; P=0.02) 1.16 (0.92 to 1.50; P=0.22)
Level 2
 Maternal power 2.40 (1.43 to 4.0; P=0.008)  2.20 (1.27 to 3.80; P=0.005) 2.10 (1.3 to 3.6; P=0.005) 2.0 (1.1 to 3.5; P=0.02)
Level 3
 Gestational risk 0.90 (0.7 to 1.12; P=0.36) 1.0 (0.8 to 1.3; P=0.9)
Primiparous 2.50 (0.9 to 6.9; P=0.08) 1.7 (0.6 to 5.1; P=0.3)
Level 4
 Maternal medicalisation  2.81 (1.51 to 5.22; P=0.001)  2.62 (1.40 to 5.00; P=0.003) 2.20 (1.17 to 4.22; P=0.01) 2.00 (1.00 to 4.00; P=0.05)
No of antenatal consultations 1.29 (1.06 to 1.57; P=0.01) 1.28 (1.04 to 1.57; P=0.02) 1.28 (1.04 to 1.57; P=0.02) 1.22 (1.0 to 1.50; P=0.07) 
*

Change in odds ratio associated with each unit change (for all variables included in model). 

Variable excluded from model because significance level >0.2 at first level of adjustment.