. 2023 Jun 1;109:104905. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104905

Table 3.

Acceptance and purchase intent ratings of the coffee samples in each test condition.

Test condition and sample	Overall liking¹⁾	Color liking	Aroma liking	Taste/flavor liking	Mouthfeel liking	Purchase intent
CLT²⁾
AM³⁾	5.20^ab4)	6.42^ab	5.60	4.79^ab	5.53^ab	2.66^a
AD	4.98^b	6.33^ab	5.45	4.73^ab	5.57^ab	2.59^a
RM	5.71^a	6.58^a	5.79	5.40^a	5.93^a	3.01^a
RD	4.94^b	5.96^b	5.27	4.66^b	5.14^b	2.59^a
P-value	0.02	0.007	0.23	0.034	0.007	0.036

HUT
AM	4.93	6.17	5.47	4.81	5.68	2.65
AD	5.22	6.39	5.88	5.04	5.76	2.78
RM	5.20	6.30	5.61	4.98	5.60	2.65
RD	5.00	6.02	5.34	4.82	5.31	2.52
P-value	0.57	0.24	0.118	0.734	0.179	0.393

N-HUT
AM	5.17^b	6.41	5.89	5.10^b	5.82	2.79
AD	5.64^ab	6.45	6.27	5.26^ab	5.96	2.87
RM	5.78^ab	6.67	6.16	5.61^ab	6.03	3.00
RD	6.03^a	6.63	6.34	5.91^a	6.18	3.20
P-value	0.02	0.576	0.294	0.026	0.57	0.069

¹Liking ratings were measured using a 9-point hedonic scale, and purchase intent was measured by using a 5-point category scale.

²CLT, HUT and N-HUT mean central location test, home-use test, and no-contact home-use test, respectively.

³AM, AD, RM and RD represent Arabica medium roasting, Arabica dark roasting, Robusta medium roasting, and Robusta dark roasting, respectively.

⁴Different superscripts within a column meant significant difference at P < 0.05 by Tukey's honest significance test.