Table 5.
Details of the ablation studies in our experiments.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | LT | C-Dice ↑ | V-Dice ↑ | V-TPR ↑ | V-FPR ↓ | C-Dice ↑ | V-Dice ↑ | V-TPR ↑ | V-FPR ↓ |
| ✗ | ✗ | 64.00 | 72.87 | 64.86 | 15.87 | 49.55 | 57.47 | 55.28 | 35.52 |
| ✓ | ✗ | 63.95 | 73.54 | 68.64 | 20.61 | 51.96 | 61.08 | 57.70 | 30.35 |
| ✗ | ✓ | 64.55 | 72.29 | 66.45 | 20.17 | 42.39 | 45.46 | 58.74 | 61.32 |
| ✓ | ✓ | 65.20 | 74.30 | 70.98 | 21.55 | 53.66 | 62.31 | 57.41 | 29.78 |
The bold values indicate the best performance.
“+ CA” and “+ LT” indicates the FedBN baseline constructed with the proposed central aggregation and local training mechanism, respectively.