| Predicted mean proportion of patients screened given different baseline control proportions | |||
| Combinations of QI strategies (no. of arms) |
30% baseline screening (95% CrI) |
50% baseline screening (95% CrI) |
70% baseline screening (95% CrI) |
| Most common combinations of QI strategies observed 3 or more times in included studies reporting retinopathy screening | |||
| CM + TC + PE + PSM (n = 6) | 0.63 (0.46 to 0.77) | 0.80 (0.67 to 0.89) | 0.90 (0.82 to 0.95) |
| CM + PE + PSM (n = 4) | 0.52 (0.34 to 0.68) | 0.72 (0.55 to 0.83) | 0.85 (0.74 to 0.92) |
| CE + CR + AF (n = 3)a | 0.37 (0.24 to 0.54) | 0.58 (0.42 to 0.73) | 0.76 (0.63 to 0.87) |
| Sequential combinations of the most effective 5 QI strategies as estimated from the model for retinopathy screening | |||
| PE + PR | 0.57 (0.34 to 0.77) | 0.75 (0.55 to 0.89) | 0.88 (0.74 to 0.95) |
| PE + PR + TC | 0.67 (0.41 to 0.86) | 0.83 (0.62 to 0.94) | 0.92 (0.79 to 0.97) |
| PE + PR + TC + FR | 0.76 (0.44 to 0.93) | 0.88 (0.65 to 0.97) | 0.94 (0.81 to 0.99) |
| PE + PR + TC + FR + EPR | 0.81 (0.49 to 0.95) | 0.91 (0.69 to 0.98) | 0.96 (0.84 to 0.99) |