Bogner 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Integrating type 2 diabetes mellitus and depression treatment among African Americans Patient RCT, conducted in a community‐based primary care practice in West Philadelphia with 12 family physicians, USA Two arms: 1) Usual care (control arm) and 2) Intervention (intervention arm) |
|
Participants | Control arm N: 29 Intervention arm N: 29 Diabetes type: type 2 Mean age: NR ± NR % Male: NR Longest follow‐up: 3 months |
|
Interventions |
Control arm: None Intervention arm: 1) Case management 2) Team changes 3) Patient education |
|
Outcomes | 1) HbA1c, mean % (SD) Control arm: pre 7.3 (2.0), post 7.9 (2.6) Intervention arm: pre 7.3 (2.3), post 6.7 (2.3) |
|
Funding source | This work was supported by an American Diabetes Association Clinical Research Award and an Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania, Pilot Research Grant | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available. |
Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Risk of contamination (other bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
Other bias | Low risk | Information not available. |