Doucette 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods	Community pharmacist‐provided extended diabetes care Patient RCT, conducted with adults who had completed 2 diabetes education sessions at a local diabetes education centre, USA Two arms: 1. Control (control arm) and 2. Intervention (intervention arm)
Participants	Control arm N: 42 Intervention arm N: 36 Diabetes type: type 2 Mean age: 60.0 ± 12.0 % Male: 57.3 Longest follow‐up: 12 months
Interventions	Control arm: None Intervention arm: 1) Case management 2) Clinician education 3) Patient education 4) Promotion of self‐management
Outcomes	1) HbA1c, mean % (SD) Control arm: pre 7.9 (1.9), post 8.0 (NR) Intervention arm: pre 8.0 (1.5), post 7.7 (NR) 2) SBP, mean mmHg (SD) Control arm: pre 119.8 (17.6), post 124.3 (NR) Intervention arm: pre 118.2 (11.7), post 125.3 (NR) 3) DBP, mean mmHg (SD) Control arm: pre 67.1 (8.3), post 67.4 (NR) Intervention arm: pre 66.6 (8.9), post 67.8 (NR) 4) LDL, mean mg/dL (SD) Control arm: pre 105.1 (36.6), post 93.1 (NR) Intervention arm: pre 100.7 (28.0), post 81.1 (NR)
Funding source	This study was supported through a grant from the Community Pharmacy Foundation
Notes	—
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Information not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Information not available.
Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias)	Low risk	Information not available.
Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias)	Low risk	Information not available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)	Low risk	Information not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias)	Low risk	Information not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Low risk	Information not available.
Risk of contamination (other bias)	Unclear risk	Information not available.
Other bias	Low risk	Information not available.