Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;2023(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513

Grant 2008.

Study characteristics
Methods Practice‐linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial
Cluster‐RCT (11 clusters), conducted in primary care practices in hospital and community‐based settings in eastern Massachusetts, USA
Two arms: 1. Active control arm (control arm) and 2. Intervention arm (intervention arm)
Participants Control arm N: 118
Intervention arm N: 126
Diabetes type: type 2
Mean age: 56.1 ± 11.6
% Male: 51.0
Longest follow‐up: 12 months
Interventions Control arm:
None
Intervention arm:
1) Electronic patient registry
2) Facilitated relay of clinical information
3) Promotion of self‐management
Outcomes 1) HbA1c
Funding source This study was supported in part by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ R01 HS013660‐02: Shared Online Health Records for Patient Safety and Care). Dr Grant is also supported by a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Career Development Award (K23DK067452)
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Cluster‐RCT.
Provider's baseline characteristics (selection bias) High risk Not reported
Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias) High risk Table ‐ P values < 0.05 for age, sex, race.
Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias) Low risk Table ‐ outcomes P < 0.05 for study participants.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Low risk Information not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias) Low risk Information not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Information not available.
Risk of contamination (other bias) Low risk Information not available.
Other bias Low risk Information not available.