Hayes 1984.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics Patient RCT, conducted in diabetic clinics from a hospital in Wales, UK Two arms: 1. General practice (control arm) and 2. Hospital (intervention arm) |
|
| Participants | Control arm N: 103 Intervention arm N: 97 Diabetes type: type 2 Mean age: 59.0 ± 8.2 % Male: 41.0 Longest follow‐up: 60 months |
|
| Interventions |
Control arm: 1) Clinician education Intervention arm: 1) Team changes |
|
| Outcomes | 1) HbA1c, mean % (SD) Control arm: pre NR (NR), post 10.4 (1.7) Intervention arm: pre NR (NR), post 9.5 (1.8) |
|
| Funding source | The trial was financed by a grant from the Office of the Chief Scientist, Department of Health and Social Security | |
| Notes | — | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available. |
| Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias) | High risk | Information not available. |
| Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Information not available. |
| Risk of contamination (other bias) | Low risk | Information not available. |
| Other bias | Low risk | Information not available. |