Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;2023(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513

Hayes 1984.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics
Patient RCT, conducted in diabetic clinics from a hospital in Wales, UK
Two arms: 1. General practice (control arm) and 2. Hospital (intervention arm)
Participants Control arm N: 103
Intervention arm N: 97
Diabetes type: type 2
Mean age: 59.0 ± 8.2
% Male: 41.0
Longest follow‐up: 60 months
Interventions Control arm:
1) Clinician education
Intervention arm:
1) Team changes
Outcomes 1) HbA1c, mean % (SD)
Control arm: pre NR (NR), post 10.4 (1.7)
Intervention arm: pre NR (NR), post 9.5 (1.8)
Funding source The trial was financed by a grant from the Office of the Chief Scientist, Department of Health and Social Security
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information not available.
Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias) High risk Information not available.
Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias) Low risk Information not available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Low risk Information not available.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias) Low risk Information not available.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Information not available.
Risk of contamination (other bias) Low risk Information not available.
Other bias Low risk Information not available.