Zapotoczky 2001.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
A controlled study of weight reduction in type 2 diabetes treated by two reinforcers RCT (NA clusters and NA providers), conducted in 1) Diabetic outpatient clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Graz, Austria. 2) A clinical dietitian in Austria 2 arms: 1. Control: (standard care) (control arm) and 2. Intervention: (treatment) (intervention arm) |
|
Participants | Control arm N: 18 Intervention arm N: 18, NA, NA Diabetes type: 2 Mean age: 57.5 ± 12.71 % Male: 36.11 Longest follow‐up: 12 months |
|
Interventions |
Control arm: (standard care) 1) Patient education Intervention arm: (treatment) 1) Case management 2) Patient education 3) Promotion of self‐management |
|
Outcomes | Glycated haemoglobin Systolic blood pressure Diastolic blood pressure Low‐density lipoprotein |
|
Funding source | Not reported | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Patient's baseline characteristics (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Table 1. No P values reported and numbers look unbalanced. No information on education or income. |
Patient's baseline outcomes (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and of outcome assessors (detection bias) | Low risk | Objective measure for HbA1c, BP, LDL. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol registered. Methods match outcomes. |
Risk of contamination (other bias) | Unclear risk | They were followed with the same physicians. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other source of bias. |