Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;13:8934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35947-2

Table 4.

Odd of major ECG abnormalities vs. regional indices.

Regional indices Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Men
 Sociogeographic 0.91* 0.85–0.98 0.96 0.89–1.03 0.97 0.89–1.06
 Demographic 1.04* 1.01–1.08 1.09* 1.05–1.13 1.08* 1.04–1.12
 Industrial 1.17* 1.12–1.22 1.16* 1.11–1.21 1.12* 1.07–1.17
Mixed 0.96* 0.95–0.97 0.96* 0.95–0.97 0.97* 0.95–0.98
 Economy 1.00 0.95–1.06 0.97 0.93–1.02 0.96 0.90–1.02
Women
 Sociogeographic 0.89* 0.80–0.98 0.91* 0.84–0.99 0.92 0.85–1.00
 Demographic 1.01 0.95–1.08 1.01 0.95–1.06 1.00 0.95–1.06
 Industrial 1.06 0.96–1.17 1.11* 1.07–1.16 1.12* 1.07–1.16
 Mixed 0.89* 0.79–0.99 0.94 0.86–1.04 0.95 0.86–1.04
 Economy 1.03 0.91–1.17 0.95 0.91–1.00 0.94* 0.89–0.99

Model 1 contains all regional indexes; Model 2, in addition to regional indices, includes individual socioeconomic characteristics; Model 3, besides regional and socioeconomic characteristics, comprises cardiovascular risk factors; *p ≤ 0.05.