Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;13:8874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35649-9

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Naive Bayes, (b) Random Forest, (c) XGBoost. Confusion matrices of the models, cancer specific survival. The Naive Bayes model (a) had the worse performance, besides not having balanced accuracy in both classes. On the other hand, the Random Forest (b) and XGBoost (c) models had a performance with a very similar accuracy.