Table 4.
ML applications in SA research.
Reference | ML application | Input | ML technique | Main output |
---|---|---|---|---|
(74) | Complication prediction | Clinical parameters | LR | AUC = 0.924, Se = 0.922, Sp = 0.733, PPV = 84.7% and NPV = 85.4% |
(77) | Complication prediction | Genomics data | SVM | AUC = 0.71, Ac = 67%, Se = 86% and Sp = 43% |
(78) | Complication prediction | Proteomics data | DT | AUC = 1, Ac = 100%, Se = 100%, Sp = 100%, Kappa = 1, PPV = 1 and NPV = 1 for recurrent SA with prethrombotic state |
(79) | Complication prediction | Clinical parameters | RF | AUC = 0.99, Ac = 0.99, Pr = 0.99, Re = 0.99, F1 = 0.99 |
(80) | Complication prediction | Electronic health records | SC | AUC = 0.909 and Ac = 89.7% for live birth |
ML, machine learning; SA, spontaneous abortion; LR, logistic regression; SVM, support vector machines; DT, decision tree; RF, random forest; SC, sparse coding; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; Ac, accuracy; Pr, precision; Re, recall.