Abstract
Objectives:
Despite the common occurrence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-associated acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), there are little data to guide optimal anticoagulation management. We sought to describe antithrombotic therapy management after stroke and outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted of venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO patients treated a tertiary center from June 2016 to February 2021. Patients with image-confirmed diagnosis of AIS or ICH while receiving ECMO were included for study with data collected regarding anticoagulation management and clinical outcomes.
Results:
Overall, 216 patients (153 VA-ECMO; 63 VV-ECMO) were included in this study. Of 153 patients on VA-ECMO, 13 (8.4%) had AIS and 6 (3.9%) had ICH. Of 63 patients on VV-ECMO, none had AIS and 5 (7.9%) had ICH. One patient (9%) received anticoagulation reversal after ICH. Anticoagulation was discontinued and later resumed in all 5 ICH survivors (median cessation time: 30 hours) and 1 (50%) of 2 AIS survivors (median cessation time: 96 hours). While off anticoagulation, two (18%) of 11 patients had thromboembolic events and none had new AIS. Upon resumption, there were no cases of hemorrhagic transformation of AIS or ICH expansion. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between patients with ICH and those without in both VA- and VV-ECMO cohorts nor between VA-ECMO patients with AIS and those without.
Conclusions:
Early cessation and judicious resumption of anticoagulation appeared feasible in the cohort of patients with ECMO-associated AIS and ICH.
Keywords: ECMO, stroke, anticoagulation
Introduction
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are life-threatening neurological complications associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. Types of ICH during ECMO therapy include intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and subdural hemorrhage (SDH). For patients supported with venoarterial (VA)-ECMO, frequency of AIS is 4–14% and frequency of ICH is 2–27%.1–6 For patients supported with venovenous (VV) ECMO, frequency of AIS is 2–6% and frequency of ICH is 4–19%.1,7–9 The wide range in frequency of AIS and ICH is due to heterogeneity in reporting of neurological complications and the lack of standardized neurological monitoring in ECMO patients.
Blood contact with the non-biological surface of the ECMO circuit activates the coagulation cascade and prompts the use of systemic anticoagulation for safe initiation of support and to reduce the risk of catastrophic clot during circuit operation.10 Unfractionated heparin is typically used to achieve target levels of anticoagulation given its availability, general familiarity, and existence of a reversal agent.11 Despite the common occurrence of ECMO-associated AIS and ICH, there are little data to guide optimal anticoagulation management strategy regarding cessation and timing of resumption after acute stroke as well as anticoagulation reversal for ICH patients. The resumption of anticoagulation should be carefully considered in ECMO, balancing pro- and anti-coagulatory demands as morbidity and mortality associated with hemorrhagic conversion of AIS and hematoma expansion of ICH is often catastrophic.12
In an effort to further insight into the clinical management of ECMO-associated stroke, we conducted a retrospective review of patients maintained on ECMO support at a tertiary-care center. Here, we present anticoagulation management for ECMO patients following diagnosis of ECMO-associated stroke. We further evaluate the risk of ischemic and thromboembolic events following cessation of anticoagulant therapy and coagulopathy reversal, hemorrhagic events after resumption of anticoagulation, and in-hospital mortality.
Patients and Methods
Study design
A retrospective study of patients on VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO at a tertiary center from June 2016 to February 2021 was performed. This study derives from a multidisciplinary effort and an initiative between the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit, Cardiac Critical Care Unit, and Neuroscience Critical Care Unit to improve overall clinical care and outcomes for patients with ECMO support.13 The study duration was selected given the start of the database in June 2016 and extended to the most recent data from February 2021. This study was approved by Johns Hopkins Hospital Institutional Review Board and informed consent was waived as this was a retrospective observational cohort study.
Participants
We included all adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who received VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO. We excluded patients who had temporary ECMO support solely in the operating room without needing to extend to the intensive care unit.
Data collection
For all patients in the study, we collected pre-cannulation characteristics including demographics, social history, past medical history, comorbidities and laboratory values. All patients underwent neurocritical care consultations and a standardized neuromonitoring per institutional protocol.13 On day 1 of cannulation, all patients received a baseline neurological examination, transcranial doppler (TCD), and electroencephalography (EEG) for 48–72 hours if the patient had a cardiac arrest. On days 3–5, all patients received neurological exams off sedation, TCD, EEG if Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was less than 8, and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) if GCS was less than 4. Sedation cessation was performed on days 3–5 of ECMO support, as deemed safe by the provider, and comatose patients were clinically indicated to receive a head computed tomography (HCT). All patients with a clinical indication for HCT and who were stable enough to be transported received HCT between day 3 and 5 after cannulation.6 Patients with acute ICH had anticoagulation discontinued until stable 6-hour and 24-hour follow-up HCT scans. When anticoagulation was resumed after stroke and two APTT values were within therapeutic range (50–65 seconds), repeat HCT scan and frequent neurological exams were performed to assess hemorrhagic conversion or hematoma expansion. Patients with AIS that were managed with anticoagulation cessation also had a follow-up HCT scan following anticoagulation resumption with two therapeutic aPTTs. This pathway is described in Supplemental Figure 1.
For all patients with AIS or ICH detected by head CT (HCT) scan while on ECMO, we collected data including antithrombotic therapy (heparin, bivalirudin, or neither), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at time of stroke identification, antithrombotic reversal, time off antithrombotic therapy (hours), and in-hospital mortality. We also collected incidence of the following thromboembolic events that occurred during the period of anticoagulation cessation: pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), intracardiac thrombus, and ECMO circuit clotting. Small infarct/hematoma volume was defined as < 5 cc. Volumes of AIS, IPH, and SDH were calculated using the ABC/2 method.14,15,16 There is no standard way of calculating hematoma volume for SAH. All neurological recommendations were provided by the neurointensive care consult team.
Definitions
For this study, neurological complications focused on AIS and ICH. AIS was defined as a cerebral infarction determined by HCT. ICH was defined as bleeding within the skull, including intra- and extra-parenchymal hemorrhage as well as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), identified by HCT scan.17 ICH was subclassified as IPH, SAH, SDH and IVH. IPH was defined as cerebral hemorrhage within the parenchyma; SAH as hemorrhage accumulated between the arachnoid and pia mater; SDH as hemorrhage accumulated between the dura mater and arachnoid; and IVH as hemorrhage into cerebral ventricular system.18
Outcomes
The primary outcomes were neurological adverse events including the presence of hemorrhagic conversion of ischemic stroke and hematoma expansion (≥6 mL or ≥33%) for ICH after the resumption of anticoagulation.19,20 The secondary outcomes were the presence of new AIS while off anticoagulation, thromboembolic events off anticoagulation, and in-hospital mortality.
Statistical analysis
Patients were analyzed in the following groups: AIS on VA-ECMO, ICH on VA-ECMO, and ICH on VV-ECMO. All data were presented as a median and range for continuous variables and absolute numbers with percentages for binary and categorical variables. Demographic and clinical characteristics including ECMO variables in patients with and without neurological events (AIS or ICH) were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for binary or categorical variables. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated. For survival analyses, differences for specific subsets of data were compared by using log-rank testing. Survival was compared between patients with AIS, ICH, or neither complication. Time zero was defined as ECMO cannulation date and patients were followed until discharge or death. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
The cohort included adult patients (n=216, 60% male, median age=55) supported with ECMO (VA-ECMO [n=153, 71%] or VV-ECMO [n=63, 29%]) between June 2016 and February 2021 (Figure 1). Baseline demographics and characteristics for the VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO cohorts are described in Tables 1 and 2. The most common ECMO indication was post-cardiotomy shock (n=79 of 153, 52%) for VA-ECMO patients and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n=53 of 63, 83%) for VV-ECMO patients. The median duration of ECMO support was 6 (1–62) days for VA-ECMO and 18 (1–114) days for VV-ECMO.
Figure 1.
Flow chart for study inclusion. *One patient had both ICH and AIS identified on initial head CT. **Two patients died before heparin resumption.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of VA-ECMO Patients
| Patient Characteristics | All patients (n=153) | AIS (n=13) | Without AIS (n=140) | p-value | ICH (n=6) | Without ICH (n=147) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Demographics | |||||||
| Age | 59 (18–83) | 62 (26–81) | 59 (18–83) | 0.38 | 54 (27–68) | 59 (18–83) | 0.32 |
| BMI | 29 (15–51) | 28 (20–39) | 29 (15–51) | 0.23 | 26 (24–31) | 29 (15–51) | 0.18 |
| Male | 95 (62) | 8 (62) | 87 (62) | p > .99 | 4 (67) | 91 (62) | p > .99 |
| Past Medical History | |||||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 51 (33) | 4 (31) | 47 (34) | p > .99 | 2 (33) | 49 (33) | p > .99 |
| Hypertension | 111 (73) | 12 (92) | 99 (70) | 0.12 | 3 (50) | 108 (73) | 0.35 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 83 (54) | 9 (69) | 74 (52) | 0.38 | 3 (50) | 80 (54) | p > .99 |
| Congestive heart failure | 51 (33) | 5 (38) | 46 (33) | 0.76 | 4 (67) | 47 (32) | 0.10 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 23 (15) | 1 (8) | 22 (16) | 0.69 | 2 (33) | 21 (14) | 0.22 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 42 (27) | 3 (23) | 39 (28) | p > .99 | 2 (33) | 40 (27) | 0.53 |
| ECMO Indication | |||||||
| Cardiogenic shock | 54 (35) | 3 (23) | 51 (36) | 0.55 | 3 (50) | 51 (35) | 0.67 |
| Post-cardiotomy shock | 79 (52) | 10 (76) | 69 (49) | 0.08 | 2 (33) | 77 (52) | 0.43 |
| ECPR | 20 (13) | 0 (0) | 20 (14) | 0.22 | 1 (17) | 19 (13) | 0.58 |
| ECMO Variables | |||||||
| Central cannulation | 71 (46) | 9 (69) | 62 (44) | 0.14 | 2 (33) | 69(47) | 0.69 |
| ECMO support days | 6 (1–62) | 7 (4–26) | 6 (1–62) | 0.12 | 11 (3–26) | 6 (1–62) | 0.13 |
| SOFA score | 11 (3–17) | 10 (7–17) | 11 (3–17) | 0.18 | 10 (9–17) | 11 (3–17) | 0.72 |
| Mortality and Discharge | |||||||
| In-Hospital Mortality | 104 (68) | 11 (85) | 93 (66) | 0.23 | 4 (67) | 100 (68) | p > .99 |
| mRS at discharge | 6 (1–7) | 6 (1–7) | 6 (1–7) | 0.70 | 6.5 (6–7) | 6 (1–7) | 0.20 |
Values are expressed as median (range) for continuous variables and absolute frequency (percentages) for categorical variables. Continuous variables compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and categorical variables compared using Fisher’s exact test.
Abbreviations: AIS= acute ischemic stroke; BMI= body mass index; ECPR= extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICH= intracranial hemorrhage; mRS= modified Rankin scale for neurologic disability; SOFA= Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; VA-ECMO= venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Table 2.
Baseline Characteristics of VV-ECMO Patients *
| Patient Characteristics | All patients (n=63) | ICH (n=5) | Without ICH (n=58) | p- value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Demographics | ||||
| Age | 44 (18–70) | 48 (30–58) | 44 (18–70) | 0.76 |
| BMI | 31 (16–46) | 28 (23–30) | 31 (16–46) | 0.11 |
| Male | 34 (54) | 3 (60) | 31 (53) | 0.58 |
| Past Medical History | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | 13 (21) | 1 (20) | 12 (21) | p > .99 |
| Hypertension | 24 (38) | 1 (20) | 23 (40) | 0.64 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 24 (38) | 1 (20) | 23 (40) | 0.64 |
| Congestive heart failure | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | p > .99 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 3 (5) | 0 (0) | 3 (5) | p > .99 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | p > .99 |
| ECMO Indication | ||||
| ARDS/ARF | 53 (84) | 5 (100) | 48 (83) | 0.58 |
| Bridge to transplant | 7 (11) | 0 (0) | 7 (12) | p > .99 |
| Other** | 3 (5) | 0 (0) | 3 (5) | p > .99 |
| ECMO Variables | ||||
| Central cannulation | 4 (6) | 0 (0) | 4 (7) | p > .99 |
| ECMO support days | 18 (1–114) | 28 (18–60) | 14 (1–114) | 0.03 |
| SOFA score | 10 (3–17) | 11 (6–12) | 11 (3–17) | 0.92 |
| Mortality and Discharge | ||||
| In-Hospital Mortality | 26 (42) | 2 (40) | 24 (41) | p > .99 |
| mRS at discharge | 5 (1–7) | 6 (2–7) | 5 (1–7) | 0.77 |
No ischemic stroke in VV-ECMO
Intraoperative for tracheal repair (n=1), IVC stenosis (n=1), pulmonary embolism (n=1)
Values are expressed as median (range) for continuous variables and absolute frequency (percentages) for categorical variables. Continuous variables compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and categorical variables compared using Fisher’s exact test.
Abbreviations: AIS= acute ischemic stroke; ARDS= acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARF= acute respiratory failure; BMI= body mass index; ECPR= extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ICH= intracranial hemorrhage; mRS= modified Rankin scale for neurologic disability; SOFA= Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; VV-ECMO= venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
VA-ECMO-associated ICH
Of 153 patients with VA-ECMO, ICH was identified in 6 (3.9%) patients: IPH (n=2), SDH (n=3), SAH (n=1), and IVH (n=2) (Table 3). One patient had both IPH and IVH, and another patient had both SAH and IVH. ICH occurred at a median of 5.5 (2–10) days from ECMO cannulation (Supplemental Figure 2). Most IPHs and SDHs were small-volume hemorrhages (n=4 of 5, 80%) with median volume of 82 (1–164) cc and 1.1 (1–1.5) cc, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3:
Patient Anticoagulation Management, Complications, and Mortality
| Imaging Findings, Anticoagulation Management, and Outcomes | VA-ECMO AIS (n=13) | VA-ECMO ICH (n=6) | VV-ECMO ICH (n=5) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| HCT Characteristics & Findings | |||
| Time to AIS or ICH, days | 4 (1–11) | 6 (2–10) | 5 (1–13) |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage | -– | 2 (33) | 2 (40) |
| Stroke volume* | 9.8 (1–83.3) | SDH: 1.1 (1–1.5) IPH: 82 (1–164) |
SDH: -– IPH: 1.3 (1–2.5) |
| Stroke volumes for those with heparin discontinuation and subsequent resumption |
1 | SDH 1.1 (1–1.5) IPH: 1 |
SDH: -– IPH: 1.3 (1–2.5) |
| Anticoagulation at Stroke Identification | |||
| Antiplatelet agent | 5 (38) | 2 (33) | 1 (20) |
| Anticoagulation Heparin Bivalirudin+ None∇ |
9 (70) 2 (15) 2 (15) |
5 (83) 0 (0) 1 (17) |
5 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) |
| aPTT, median | 39.2 (22.8–58.8) | 50.0 (27.4–57.3) | 60.9 (34.1–65.6) |
| Anticoagulation Cessation & Resumption | |||
| Protamine sulfate reversal | 0 (0) | 1 (17) | 0 (0) |
| No heparin cessation | 7 (85) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Heparin cessation | 2 (15) | 5 (83) | 5 (100) |
| Heparin resumption | 1 (8) | 4 (67) | 5 (100) |
| Duration of heparin discontinuation, hours | 96 (96) | 45 (30–96) | 33 (6–136) |
| Thromboembolic Events While Heparin Discontinued | |||
| Pulmonary embolism | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) |
| Deep venous thrombosis | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) |
| Intracardiac thrombus | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| ECMO circuit clot | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (20) |
| Repeat HCT Findings | |||
| New AIS off anticoagulation | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| ICH: hematoma expansion after resumption | -– | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| AIS: hemorrhagic conversion after resumption |
0 (0) | -– | -– |
| In-Hospital Mortality | |||
| In-hospital mortality | 11 (85) | 4 (67) | 2 (40) |
| In-hospital mortality if heparin discontinued |
1 (50) | 3 (60) | 2 (40) |
| In-hospital mortality if heparin resumed |
0 (0) | 2 (50) | 2 (40) |
Sizes of intracerebral and subdural hemorrhages calculated using ABC/2 method
Both patients on bivalirudin continued anticoagulation after stroke identification
Reason for no anticoagulation: massive intraoperative bleeding (n=3)
Values are expressed as median (range) for continuous variables and absolute frequency (percentages) for categorical variables.
Abbreviations: AIS= acute ischemic stroke; aPTT= activated partial thromboplastin time; HCT= head computed tomography; ICH= intracranial hemorrhage; VA-ECMO= venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VV-ECMO= venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
At time of ICH, 5 (83%) of 6 patients were on full dose heparin infusion with a median aPTT of 50.0 (32.4–57.3) (Supplemental Figure 3). One patient was not on heparin infusion due to intraoperative chest cavity hemorrhage with massive transfusion protocol. After ICH diagnosis, heparin was discontinued in all 5 patients (100%). Protamine sulfate reversal was only used in 1 of 6 patients due to extensive SAH with significant hydrocephalus and dilated, non-reactive pupils. This patient died before heparin resumption or repeat stability HCT. The other four patients, who all had small-volume ICHs, were resumed on heparin infusion (median rate: 875 units/hour, range: 500–1200 units/hour) without boluses following stable HCT after a median cessation time of 45 (30–96) hours.
While anticoagulation was held, there were no thromboembolic events and repeat HCTs performed 1 to 3 days after heparin cessation showed no evidence of new AIS (Table 3). Additionally, after resumption of anticoagulation and two therapeutic aPTTs, HCT did not demonstrate evidence of hematoma expansion or new ICHs for all patients.
In-hospital mortality for all VA-ECMO patients with ICH was 67% (n=4 of 6). Meanwhile, in-hospital mortality was 50% (n=2 of 4) among patients managed with heparin cessation and later resumption (Table 3). With careful resumption of anticoagulation and stability HCTs, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrates no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between VA-ECMO patients with ICH (n=4 of 6, 67%) compared to those without ICH (n=100 of 147, 68%) (Table 1, Figure 2A).
Figure 2.
A. VA-ECMO cohort in-hospital survival from day of cannulation (Log rank test: χ2 =2.68, p=0.26). B. VV-ECMO cohort in-hospital survival from day of cannulation (Log rank test: χ2 = 0.02; p=0.88). There were no cases of ischemic stroke in the VV-ECMO cohort.
Abbreviations: AIS= acute ischemic stroke; ICH= intracranial hemorrhage; IPH= intraparenchymal hemorrhage; SAH= subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDH= subdural hemorrhage; VA-ECMO= venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; VV-ECMO= venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
VA-ECMO-associated AIS
Out of 153 patients with VA-ECMO, thirteen (8.4%) had AIS during ECMO support at a median of 4 (1–11) days from ECMO cannulation (Supplemental Figure 2). Of these AIS patients, 69% (n=9 of 13) had infarcts ≥5 cc in volume (median: 10 cc, range: 1.0–83.3). Post-cardiotomy shock was the indication for ECMO initiation in 69% (n=9 of 13) of patients with AIS versus 33% (n=46 of 140) of patients without AIS (p=0.01) (Table 1).
At the time of AIS diagnosis, 11 (85%) of 13 patients were on anticoagulation therapy (9 with heparin; 2 with bivalirudin). Two (15%) of 13 patients were not on anticoagulation due to massive intraoperative bleeding. Of the 11 patients on anticoagulation, 9 patients (median infarct size: 9.8 cc) were continued on anticoagulation (2 with bivalirudin; 7 with heparin). The other 2 of 11 patients (median infarct size: 11.7 cc) had heparin infusion discontinued due to potential for hemorrhagic conversion of AIS (infarct volume: 22.4 cc) and concurrent GI bleed, respectively (Table 3). The former died before anticoagulation resumption, and the latter was resumed on heparin infusion (500 units/hour) without boluses after 96 hours.
During the period of heparin cessation, there were no thromboembolic events and repeat HCT 2–3 days after heparin discontinuation showed no evidence of new AIS. After resumption with two therapeutic aPTTs, HCT was performed per protocol and demonstrated no evidence of hemorrhagic conversion of AIS or new ICH.
In-hospital mortality among all patients with AIS was 85% (n=11 of 13). Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrates no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between VA-ECMO patients with AIS (n=11 of 13, 85%) compared to those without AIS (n=93 of 140, 66%) (Table 1, Figure 2A). Notably, the only patient managed with anticoagulation cessation and later resumption was 1 of 2 AIS patients that survived to discharge. Meanwhile, only 1 of 9 patients continued on anticoagulation survived to discharge.
VV-ECMO Associated ICH
Of the 63 patients on VV-ECMO, ICH was identified in 5 (3.9%) patients: IPH (n=2), SAH (n=3), IVH (n=2), and SDH (n=0). The median volume of IPH was 1.3 (1–2.5) cc. ICH occurred at a median of 5 (1–13) days from ECMO cannulation (Supplemental Figure 2). Patients with ICH had a longer duration of ECMO support (median: 28 days) than those without ICH (median: 14 days, p=0.03) (Table 2).
All 5 patients were on full dose heparin infusion (median aPTT: 60.9, range: 34.1–65.6) at time of ICH (Supplemental Figure 3). No patients received protamine sulfate for heparin reversal. Heparin was discontinued and later resumed (median rate: 1000 U/hr, range: 500–1350 units/hour) without boluses in all patients following stable repeat HCT images after median discontinuation time of 33 (6–136) hours (Table 3).
While anticoagulation was held, repeat HCTs performed 1 to 4 days after heparin cessation showed no evidence of new AIS. However, two patients had thromboembolic events diagnosed during the period of heparin cessation: ECMO circuit clot (n=1), PE (n=1) and DVT (n=1). After resumption of anticoagulation with two therapeutic aPTTs, HCT was performed per protocol and revealed no evidence of hematoma expansion or new ICH in all patients.
In-hospital mortality was 40% (n=2 of 5) with a median time from ECMO cannulation to death of 46 (31–60) days. With careful resumption of anticoagulation and stability HCTs, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between VV-ECMO patients with ICH (n=2 of 5, 40%) compared to those without ICH (n=24 of 58, 41%) (Table 1, Figure 2B).
Discussion
In this clinical series, we found that early cessation and judicious resumption of intravenous anticoagulation appears safe in patients with ECMO-associated AIS and ICH. While off anticoagulation, two (18%) of 11 patients had thromboembolic events and none had new ischemic infarcts. Upon anticoagulation resumption, there were no cases of ICH expansion or hemorrhagic transformation of AIS. This study represents the first report, to our knowledge, describing anticoagulation reversal and resumption strategies and outcomes after ECMO-associated stroke.
Our study found a prevalence of AIS and ICH in VA-ECMO of 8.4% (n=13 of 153) and 3.9% (n=6 of 153), respectively. Le Guennec et al., in a retrospective observational study of 878 VA-ECMO-treated patients at a tertiary referral center, reported an AIS prevalence of 5.3% and an ICH prevalence of 2.8%.2 For VV-ECMO, our study reports incidences of AIS and ICH of 0% and 7.9% (n=5 of 63), respectively. Another observational study of 135 patients on VV-ECMO reported similar results, with a prevalence of 2% for AIS and 7.5% for ICH.8 Though our cohort consists of fewer patients than those in the referenced studies, the frequencies of AIS and ICH are similar to prior reports.
For AIS in patients on VA-ECMO, we report an in-hospital mortality of 85%, with no difference in mortality among patients with AIS versus those without AIS. Similarly, a retrospective review of 10,342 VA-ECMO patients from the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry by Cho et al. found an in-hospital mortality of 76% in patients with AIS.17 Additionally, in our cohort, in-hospital mortality was 67% for VA-ECMO associated ICH and 40% for VV-ECMO associated ICH. Notably, we report no difference in in-hospital mortality among patients with ICH compared to those without ICH in the VA-ECMO and VV-ECMO cohorts. In comparison, a systematic review of ECMO-associated ICH by Fletcher-Sandersjoo et al. found that mortality in ICH cohorts varied between 32% and 100% with a relative risk of mortality of 1.27 to 4.43 compared to non-ICH cohorts.21 Hematoma volumes were not reported due to lack of data.21 While our cohort’s in-hospital mortality falls within the range reported by Fletcher-Sandersjoo et al., our ICH cohorts did not have an increased mortality risk compared to their non-ICH counterparts. This may be a result of early detection from standardized neuromonitoring with routine imaging,13,22 early intervention such as cessation of anticoagulation, and the small volume (<5 cc) of the majority of ICHs. Although there are limited data on size of ECMO-associated ICH, small volumes of ICHs in our center may be due to early detection of injury via standardized neuromonitoring protocol and neurocritical care team consultation.13,22
In both VA- and VV-ECMO cohorts, the majority of patients with ICH were managed with discontinuation and later resumption of heparin anticoagulation (median cessation time: 45 hours in VA-ECMO, 33 hours in VV-ECMO). In contrast, only two of 13 patients with AIS had heparin discontinued. Heparin cessation and resumption appeared safe in our cohort, with no new AIS during the period of anticoagulant cessation regardless of the duration. Thromboembolic complications during the period anticoagulation cessation were only seen in two (18%) of the 11 stroke patients managed with heparin discontinuation, both with ICH while on VV-ECMO. Following anticoagulation resumption, there was no hemorrhagic expansion of ICH or hemorrhagic transformation of AIS in any patient. Reversal of anticoagulation was rare with protamine sulfate reversal given to only 1 (9%) of 11 patients with ICH due to large hematoma size. Despite the almost uniform avoidance of protamine reversal, there were no cases of hemorrhagic expansion among patients with acute ICH.
The majority of ICHs in our VA- and VV-ECMO cohorts were small-volume hemorrhages. Routine imaging that is part of our neuromonitoring protocol may have contributed to the identification of small-volume hemorrhages. By potentially increasing early detection of small-volume hemorrhages or infarcts before they may be clinically significant, our protocol may allow for an early intervention to prevent further worsening of brain injury. Our study suggests that standardized neuromonitoring and neurological expertise in management of patients on ECMO support may lessen neurologic morbidities, but studies at other institutions and in larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings.13
Our study is limited by the small number of ECMO patients (n=23) with AIS or ICH. Since AIS and ICH were identified by HCT and not all ECMO patients had brain imaging, the number of patients identified with either is likely an underestimate of the true number of neurological complications, especially given high mortality in ECMO patients in general. Given the small numbers of patients with AIS or ICH, we are unable to draw definitive conclusions about the differences in mortality and thromboembolic risk among those managed with a period of anticoagulation cession versus those managed with continuous anticoagulation therapy. Our study is also limited by a selection bias, favoring anticoagulation resumption in smaller strokes, with the largest stroke volume being 2.5 ccs. One VA-ECMO patient with extensive SAH and one VA-ECMO patient with a 22.4 cc AIS died before resumption, excluding these patients from the study. Additionally, there is not enough data to conclude that this anticoagulation approach is safer than standard-of-care. Although the Kaplan-Meier curve shows no survival difference between ECMO patients with and without ICH, this study may not be sufficiently powered to detect a true difference. However, this study highlights feasibility of anticoagulation reversal and resumption strategies in cases of ECMO-associated stroke and identifies associated rates of mortality and thromboembolic complications.
Conclusions
Early cessation and judicious resumption of anticoagulation appeared feasible in the cohort of patients with ECMO-associated AIS and ICH. Further research is needed to guide standardized anticoagulation practices in management of ECMO-associated stroke.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding Statement:
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI 1K23HL157610 to Sung-Min Cho] and [NHLBI 5K08HL14332 to Steven Keller].
Abbreviations
- AIS
acute ischemic stroke
- ICH
intracranial hemorrhage
- VA-ECMO
venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- VV-ECMO
venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement:
All other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Bartek J, Thelin EP, et al. Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational cohort study. J Intensive Care 5: 27, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Le Guennec L, Cholet C, Huang F, et al. Ischemic and hemorrhagic brain injury during venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Intensive Care 8: 129, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Omar HR, Mirsaeidi M, Shumac J, Enten G, Mangar D, Camporesi EM. Incidence and predictors of ischemic cerebrovascular stroke among patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. J Crit Care 32: 48–51, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lorusso R, Barili F, Mauro MD, et al. In-Hospital Neurologic Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Crit Care Med 44: 964–972, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kasirajan V, Smedira NG, McCarthy JF, Casselman F, Boparai N, McCarthy PM. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15: 508–514, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cho SM, Farrokh S, Whitman G, Bleck TP, Geocadin RG. Neurocritical Care for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients. Crit Care Med 47: 1773–1781, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lorusso R, Gelsomino S, Parise O, et al. Neurologic Injury in Adults Supported With Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: Findings From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Database. Crit Care Med 45: 1389–1397, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luyt CE, Bréchot N, Demondion P, et al. Brain injury during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 42: 897–907, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lockie CJA, Gillon SA, Barrett NA, et al. Severe Respiratory Failure, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, and Intracranial Hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 45: 1642–1649, 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kirklin JK, Westaby S, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Chenoweth DE, Pacifico AD. Complement and the damaging effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 86: 845–857, 1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Popugaev KA, Bakharev SA, Kiselev KV, et al. Clinical and pathophysiologic aspects of ECMO-associated hemorrhagic complications. PLoS One 15: e0240117, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Thelin EP, Bartek J, Elmi-Terander A, Broman M, Bellander BM. Management of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): An observational cohort study. PLoS One 12: e0190365, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cho SM, Ziai W, Mayasi Y, et al. Noninvasive Neurological Monitoring in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. ASAIO Journal 66: 388–393, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Won SY, Zagorcic A, Dubinski D, et al. Excellent accuracy of ABC/2 volume formula compared to computer-assisted volumetric analysis of subdural hematomas. PLoS One 13: e0199809, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, et al. The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27: 1304–1305, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sims JR, Gharai LR, Schaefer PW, et al. ABC/2 for rapid clinical estimate of infarct, perfusion, and mismatch volumes. Neurology 72: 2104–2110, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cho SM, Canner J, Chiarini G, et al. Modifiable Risk factors and mortality from ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Results from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Crit Care Med 48: 897–905, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huisman TAGM. Intracranial hemorrhage: ultrasound, CT and MRI findings. Eur Radiol. 15: 434–440, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brouwers HB, Chang Y, Falcone GJ, et al. Predicting Hematoma Expansion After Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage. JAMA Neurol 71: 158–164, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang EF, Meeker M, Holland MC. Acute Traumatic Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage: Risk Factors for Progression in the Early Post-injury Period. Neurosurgery 58: 647–656, 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fletcher-Sandersjöö A, Thelin EP, Bartek J, et al. Incidence, Outcome, and Predictors of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic and Narrative Review. Front Neurol 9: 548, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ong CS, Etchill E, Dong J, et al. Neuromonitoring detects brain injury in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg : S0022–5223, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



