Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;24:448. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06565-w

Table 2.

Comparative results of the lower limb parameters between the injured and uninjured limbs of injured players

Injured players(n = 25)
Injured limb (n = 25) Uninjured limb (n = 25) p value
< muscle flexibility tests > 
 iliopsoas muscle flexibility, degree 7.9 ± 3.2 7.8 ± 3.4 0.88
 quadriceps muscle flexibility, degree 26.7 ± 6.7 28.0 ± 7.1 0.46
 hamstring muscle flexibility, degree 25.3 ± 9.3 24.4 ± 8.3 0.50
 gastrocnemius muscle flexibility, degree 9.8 ± 4.4 10.5 ± 4.1 0.17
 soleus muscle flexibility, degree 17.8 ± 6.1 17.6 ± 5.5 0.86
< joint range of motion > 
 hip internal rotation angle, degree 36.2 ± 8.9 35.0 ± 8.0 0.32
 knee extension angle, degree 0.12 ± 5.4 1.56 ± 4.9 0.09
 ankle dorsal flex angle, degree 49.5 ± 5.5 46.7 ± 4.8 0.32
< muscle strength tests > 
 isometric knee extension, Nm 240.0 ± 43.7 227.1 ± 51.8 0.18
 isometric knee extension / BW, Nm/kg 298.4 ± 56.3 280.8 ± 63.7 0.14
 isometric knee flexion, Nm 111.6 ± 28.3 112.4 ± 29.7 0.86
 isometric knee flexion / BW, Nm/kg 141.8 ± 35.0 142.1 ± 36.1 0.96
 H/Q 0.47 ± 0.11 0.50 ± 0.11 0.30
 isometric hip abduction, Nm 181.5 ± 32.9 185.1 ± 33.2 0.26
 isometric hip abduction / BW, Nm/kg 231.4 ± 44.5 236.2 ± 45.7 0.27
< balance tests > 
 COP in single-leg balance, mm 496.5 ± 153.3 489.2 ± 117.7 0.73

BW: body weight, H/Q: hamstring to quadriceps strength ratio

* : significant difference (p < 0.05)

The data are presented as average ± standard deviation