Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2022 Feb 1;117(6):1748–1757. doi: 10.1111/add.15796

TABLE 4.

Adjusted ORs comparing interventions to BA

MI vs BA RR vs BA MI + RR vs BA
aORa 95%CI P value aOR 95% CI P value aOR 95% CI P value
Primary outcome point, prevalence abstinence
ITT MNAR 1.56 0.81, 3.02 0.1847 3.17* 1.69*, 5.94* 0.0003* 3.16* 1.68*, 5.93* 0.0003*
ITT MAR 1.68 0.86, 3.27 0.1298 3.75* 1.98*, 7.12* <0.0001* 3.55* 1.87*, 6.75* 0.0001*
Secondary outcome, prolonged abstinence
ITT MNAR 1.56 0.77, 3.13 0.2143 3.09* 1.59*, 6.02* 0.0009* 2.89* 1.48*, 5.63* 0.0019*
ITT MAR 1.63 0.79, 3.36 0.1889 3.46* 1.76*, 6.83* 0.0004* 3.04* 1.53*, 6.04* 0.0016*

Abbreviations: BA, brief advice (comparison); ITT MAR, intention to treat missing at random; ITT MNAR, intention to treat missing not at random; MI, motivational interviewing; RR, rate reduction; RR + MI, motivational interviewing + rate reduction.

a

aOR, adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, education and baseline FTCD score.

*

Significant P values.