Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;102(22):e33924. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033924

Table 1.

Summary of characteristics of included studies.

Study (design) Country Participant age (mean ± SD) Setting Intervention type Comparator Post-thrombotic syndrome Venous thromboembolism Follow-up time (mean mo) Total participants allocated Intervention group participants
ATTRACT[28] (RCT) Canada and USA 51 ± 14 (experimental), 51 ± 13 (comparator) Hospital* Stenting, angioplasty, thrombolysis and thrombectomy Anticoagulation, compression stockings and clinical care MD −0.57 (95% CI −0.60 to −0.54), VCSS RR 1.48 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.31) 24 692 Stenting 82/297 (28%); angioplasty: 184/297 (62%); thrombectomy: 183/297 (62%)
Cakir[29] (RCT) Turkey 53, range 34–79 (experimental), 59, range 30–83 (comparator) Hospital* Stenting, angioplasty, and thrombectomy Anticoagulation, compression stockings and clinical care NR RR 0.25 (95% CI 0.03 to 2.05) 12 42 Stenting 14/21 (66%); angioplasty 19/21 (90%); thrombectomy 21/21 (100%)
CAVA[30] (RCT) Netherlands 51 ± 22.6 (experimental); 51.7 ± 20.3 (comparator) Hospital* Stenting, angioplasty, thrombolysis and thrombectomy Anticoagulation MD −0.90 (95% CI −2.09 to 0.29), Villalta score; RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.32), Villalta score dichotomous data RR 3.65 (95% CI 1.27 to 10.50), recurrent DVT; RR 0.19 (95% CI 0.01 to 3.99), PE 10 184 Stenting 35/77 (45%); stenting or angioplasty 42/77 (55%); thrombolysis 77/77 (100%)
Jiang[31] (RCT) China 50.85 ± 1.95 Hospital* Stenting, angioplasty and thrombolysis, compression stockings and clinical care Anticoagulation, thrombolysis, compression stockings and clinical care MD −2.78 (95% CI −3.48 to −2.09) VCSS, MD −3.95 (95% CI −4.80 to −3.10), CEAP NR 24 (experimental), 18 (control) 66 Stenting 35/77 27/27 (100%); thrombolysis 27/27 (100%)
Meng[32] (RCT) China 46 ± 24 Hospital* Stenting, thrombolysis, IVCF Thrombolysis, IVCF MD −26.37 (95% CI −30.99 to −21.74), VCSS NR 24 74 Stenting 45/45 (100%), thrombolysis 45/45 (100%)
Rossi[33] RCT Brazil 57 (range 26–77) Hospital* Stenting, venotonics, compression stockings, and Unna Boot plus elastic bandages for CEAP C6 participants Venotonics, compression stockings, and Unna Boot plus elastic bandages for CEAP C6 participants MD 2.73 (95% CI (−2.10 to 7.56), VCSS NR 6 22 Stenting 7/7 (100%)
Zhang[34] (RCT) China Range 21–75 Hospital* Stenting and thrombolysis Thrombolysis MD −0.05 (95% CI −0.41 to 0.31), Villalta RR 1.19 (95% CI 0.28 to 5.07), recurrent DVT 24 376 Stenting 7/7 (100%)

CEAP = Clinical (C), Etiological (E), Anatomical (A), and Pathophysiological (P), CI = confidence interval, IVCF = inferior vena cava filter, MD = mean difference, NR = not reported, RCT = randomized controlled trial, RR = risk ratio, SD = standard deviation, VCSS = venous clinical severity score.

*

Hospital: includes operation theater, exclusive endovascular suite or hybrid surgical theater.

Including recurrent DVT and PE, fatal or non-fatal.

Villalta dichotomous data was reported as the proportion of participants with more than 4 points.