Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 2;299(7):104886. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104886

Table 1.

Estimated Tm, Kd and thermodynamic parameters of binding of various inhibitors to MProWT and its catalytic dyad mutants


Constructs
Tm (°C) ΔTm (°C) Kd (μM) ΔH (kcal/mol) ΔS (cal/mol/K) ΔG (kcal/mol)
MProWT 53.9 ± 0.1
MProC145A 60.7 ± 0.1 6.8
MPro1-304/C145A 59 ± 0.1 5.1
MProH41A 53.9 ± 0.1 0
MProWT + NMV 75 ± 0.1 21.1 0.007 ± 0.003a −10.8 ± 0.7 1.57 −11.2
MProWT + NMV (8.2) 0.012 ± 0.006 −11.8 ± 0.1 −2.86 −10.9
MProC145A + NMV 68.5 ± 0.1 7.8 2.7 ± 0.9b −3.9 ± 0.2 12.6 −7.7
MPro1-304/C145A + NMV 66.5 ± 0.1 7.5 9.2 ± 1.7 −4.3 ± 0.2 8.9 −6.9
MProH41A + NMV 73.6 ± 0.1 19.7 0.14 ± 0.02 −8.4 ± 0.05 3.5 −9.5
MProH41A + NMV (8.2) 0.03 ± 0.02 −8.5 ± 0.17 6.07 −10.4
MProWT + NBH2 70.6 ± 0.1 16.7 0.026 ± 0.016a −8.76 ± 0.17 5.63 −10.5
MPro1-304/C145A + NBH2 60.5 ± 0.1 1.5 nd
MProH41A + NBH2 67.1 ± 0.1 13.2 2.3 ± 0.9 −1.47 ± 0.01 20.9 7.76
MProWT + GC373c,d 73.7 ± 0.1 19.8 0.15 ± 0.03 −6.7 ± 0.1 9.1 −9.4
MProC145A + GC373 60.9 ± 0.1 0.2 nd
MPro1-304/C145A + GC373 58.9 ± 0.1 −0.1 nd
MProH41A + GC373d 70.8 ± 0.1 16.9 1.4 ± 0.5 −5.6 ± 0.2 8.3 −8.1
MProWT + ESV 72.9 ± 0.2 18.9 0.006 ± 0.003 −15.4 ± 0.01 −13.9 −11.2
MProC145A + ESV 71.8 ± 0.2 11.1 0.226 ± 0.061 −11.5 ± 0.2 −7.8 −9.2
MProH41A + ESV 71.9 ± 0.1 18 0.056 ± 0.031 −9.53 ± 0.23 1.53 −10

Tm values were extracted from DSF profiles shown in Figure 1, C and D. ΔTm denotes the difference in Tm in the presence and absence of inhibitor. Inhibitor binding (Kd) to MPro1-304/C145A along with corresponding MPro controls (a (38)). Not determined (nd) because of no heat response when titrating 50 μM protein in the cell and 0.5 mM inhibitor, indicative of very weak binding, relative to the binding of NMV to MProC145A and MPro1-304/C145A. DSF scans and ITC were not carried out with BBH1 because of poor solubility. b, c, d cited from references (15, 28, 29). All titrations were performed in buffer C (pH 7.2) except for two at pH 8.2, indicated in parantheses in the first column.