Table 1.
Estimated Tm, Kd and thermodynamic parameters of binding of various inhibitors to MProWT and its catalytic dyad mutants
Constructs |
Tm (°C) | ΔTm (°C) | Kd (μM) | ΔH (kcal/mol) | ΔS (cal/mol/K) | ΔG (kcal/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MProWT | 53.9 ± 0.1 | |||||
MProC145A | 60.7 ± 0.1 | 6.8 | ||||
MPro1-304/C145A | 59 ± 0.1 | 5.1 | ||||
MProH41A | 53.9 ± 0.1 | 0 | ||||
MProWT + NMV | 75 ± 0.1 | 21.1 | 0.007 ± 0.003a | −10.8 ± 0.7 | 1.57 | −11.2 |
MProWT + NMV (8.2) | 0.012 ± 0.006 | −11.8 ± 0.1 | −2.86 | −10.9 | ||
MProC145A + NMV | 68.5 ± 0.1 | 7.8 | 2.7 ± 0.9b | −3.9 ± 0.2 | 12.6 | −7.7 |
MPro1-304/C145A + NMV | 66.5 ± 0.1 | 7.5 | 9.2 ± 1.7 | −4.3 ± 0.2 | 8.9 | −6.9 |
MProH41A + NMV | 73.6 ± 0.1 | 19.7 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | −8.4 ± 0.05 | 3.5 | −9.5 |
MProH41A + NMV (8.2) | 0.03 ± 0.02 | −8.5 ± 0.17 | 6.07 | −10.4 | ||
MProWT + NBH2 | 70.6 ± 0.1 | 16.7 | 0.026 ± 0.016a | −8.76 ± 0.17 | 5.63 | −10.5 |
MPro1-304/C145A + NBH2 | 60.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 | nd | |||
MProH41A + NBH2 | 67.1 ± 0.1 | 13.2 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | −1.47 ± 0.01 | 20.9 | 7.76 |
MProWT + GC373c,d | 73.7 ± 0.1 | 19.8 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | −6.7 ± 0.1 | 9.1 | −9.4 |
MProC145A + GC373 | 60.9 ± 0.1 | 0.2 | nd | |||
MPro1-304/C145A + GC373 | 58.9 ± 0.1 | −0.1 | nd | |||
MProH41A + GC373d | 70.8 ± 0.1 | 16.9 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | −5.6 ± 0.2 | 8.3 | −8.1 |
MProWT + ESV | 72.9 ± 0.2 | 18.9 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | −15.4 ± 0.01 | −13.9 | −11.2 |
MProC145A + ESV | 71.8 ± 0.2 | 11.1 | 0.226 ± 0.061 | −11.5 ± 0.2 | −7.8 | −9.2 |
MProH41A + ESV | 71.9 ± 0.1 | 18 | 0.056 ± 0.031 | −9.53 ± 0.23 | 1.53 | −10 |
Tm values were extracted from DSF profiles shown in Figure 1, C and D. ΔTm denotes the difference in Tm in the presence and absence of inhibitor. Inhibitor binding (Kd) to MPro1-304/C145A along with corresponding MPro controls (a (38)). Not determined (nd) because of no heat response when titrating 50 μM protein in the cell and 0.5 mM inhibitor, indicative of very weak binding, relative to the binding of NMV to MProC145A and MPro1-304/C145A. DSF scans and ITC were not carried out with BBH1 because of poor solubility. b, c, d cited from references (15, 28, 29). All titrations were performed in buffer C (pH 7.2) except for two at pH 8.2, indicated in parantheses in the first column.