Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2023 Mar 16;38(4):305–322. doi: 10.1037/pag0000728

Table 5.

Results of permuted, mixed-design ANOVAs testing the effects of timepoint, group and age group on salivary alpha amylase (A) and cortisol (B) levels

Effect df F η2p Parametric p Permutation p

 A. Salivary alpha amylase

Group 1, 102 0.01 <.001 .909 .906
Age group 1, 102 31.03 .233 <.001 <.001
Group × Age group 1, 102 0.09 .001 .766 .769
Timepoint 1, 102 4.84 .045 .030 .029
Timepoint × Group 1, 102 0.21 .002 .644 .648
Timepoint × Age group 1, 102 0.59 .006 .445 .450
Timepoint × Group × Age group 1, 102 0.00 <.001 .952 .953

 B. Salivary cortisol

Group 1, 102 1.82 .018 .180 .178
Age group 1, 102 27.09 .210 <.001 <.001
Group × Age group 1, 102 0.80 .008 .372 .369
Timepoint 1, 102 3.07 .029 .083 .082
Timepoint × Group 1, 102 0.27 .003 .602 .607
Timepoint × Age group 1, 102 4.93 .046 .029 .025
Timepoint × Group × Age group 1, 102 0.42 .004 .517 .514

Note. For (A), salivary alpha amylase levels were assessed at two timepoints: immediately prior to and immediately following the first handgrip run. For (B), salivary cortisol levels were assessed at two points: prior to the initial baseline resting period, and following all handgrip and n-back runs.