Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2023 Mar 16;38(4):305–322. doi: 10.1037/pag0000728

Table 7.

Results of mixed-design ANOVAs testing the effects of group and working memory load on maximum pupil diameter (A), and the onset time of maximum pupil diameter (B) during n-back trials

Age group Effect df F η2p p

 A. Maximum pupil diameter on n-back trials

Younger Group 1, 39 0.68 .017 .415
Younger Load 2.65, 103.26 53.31 .578 <.001
Younger Group × Load 2.65, 103.26 1.49 .037 .224
Older Group 1, 31 0.31 .010 .579
Older Load 1.89, 58.71 17.28 .358 <.001
Older Group × Load 1.89, 58.71 2.22 .067 .120

 B. Onset time of maximum pupil diameter on n-back trials

Younger Group 1, 39 2.25 .055 .142
Younger Load 2.57, 100.1 4.21 .097 .011
Younger Group × Load 2.57, 100.1 0.79 .020 .484
Older Group 1, 31 0.37 .012 .546
Older Load 1.72, 53.41 2.48 .074 .101
Older Group × Load 1.72, 53.41 0.36 .011 .670

Note. Because older participants did not complete the 3-back load, these analyses were performed for each age group separately. Pupil diameter values during each trial were baseline-corrected prior to analysis based on the mean pupil diameter in the fixation period at the start of the respective block, before participants were aware of the working memory load tested on that block. ANOVAs included only trials for which participants made a correct response or correctly withheld a response.