Table 2.
Conventional techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Freeze drying |
(i) Suitable technique to develop interconnected pores (ii) Low temperature (iii) Distinct leaching is not necessary |
(i) Irregular and small pores (ii) Time consuming process |
[183] |
Gas foaming |
(i) Porous scaffolds (ii) Do not use organic solvents |
(i) Pore geometry cannot be controlled (ii) Require excessive heat (iii) Non-interconnected pore structures |
[184] |
Electrospinning |
(i) Controlled porosity, fiber diameter and pore size (ii) Micro- to nano-sized diameter scaffolds (iii) Highly porous scaffolds |
(i) Use organic solvents (ii) Low mechanical strength (iii) Pore size is reduced with fiber thickness |
[185], [186], [187] |
Thermally induced phase separation |
(i) Highly porous 3D scaffolds (ii) Excellent mechanical properties |
(i) Small pores (<200 µm) (ii) Use of organic solvent, which are harmful to cells |
[188] |
Solvent casting |
(i) Expensive equipment is not required (ii) Ease of fabrication |
(i) Develop simple shape scaffolds only (ii) Use residual solvents |
[189] |
Solvent casting /particulate leaching |
(i) Expensive equipment is not required (ii) Ease of fabrication |
(i) Protein denaturation (ii) Lack of control on the interconnectivity of pores (iii) Only form simple shape scaffolds (iv) Residual solvent is harmful to cells |
[190] |
Powder forming |
(i) Scaffolds with high porosity (ii) Tailorable pore size |
(i) Use organic solvents | [191] |
Sol-gel method | (i) Develop scaffolds by using different types of ceramics | (i) Low mechanical strength of scaffolds | [192] |